Atlanta Braves back down saying the Hank Aaron Statue is staying in Atlanta

By Maria Saporta

After more than a year of trying to lay claim to the historic Hank Aaron Statue and seeking to move it to its new ballpark in Cobb County, the Atlanta Braves now say the monument can stay in Atlanta.

In a statement released late Friday, the Braves called the fight over the statue “divisive” and not in the spirit of the Homerun King himself.

Hank Aaron

Doug Shipman, Hank Aaron and Joe Barry Carroll at a lunch honoring sports heroes (Photo by Maria Saporta)

“Nothing could be further from the character of Hank Aaron than the divisive conversations that are occurring over his iconic statue,” the Braves statement read. “As such, the Atlanta Braves have decided that we will no longer contest the eventual location of the statue and will instead focus on how to best showcase Hank’s impact and legacy at SunTrust Park. Part of this will include commissioning a new statue for all baseball fans to see. “

That was actually a solution suggested in Maria’s Metro column a year ago  But at the time, the Braves claimed that they owned the statue and that they had a plan to display it at SunTrust Park.

As recently as two days ago, the Braves indicated they still wanted the statue, but they said they would leave it up to Hank Aaron to decide where he wanted it to stay. That put Aaron in an awkward position because he still is an employee of the Atlanta Braves.

The Braves statement did not indicate why the organization had decided to no longer fight the Atlanta-Fulton Recreation Authority over the statue. The Authority actually thought the Braves had agreed to letting the statue stay in Atlanta earlier this month, but the Braves said there was no such agreement.

Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed said Thursday that: “legally the Atlanta-Fulton Recreation Authority has the right to it.” But the Mayor then added: “I think the Aarons should decide that.”

In October 2014, both Billye and Hank Aaron – in an interview in their home – made it clear that they believed the statue should remain in Atlanta. Since then, the Aarons have not wanted to publicly express their opinion because they did not want to get in the middle of the Braves and the residents of Atlanta and Fulton County.

The Braves’ statement went on to say: “Hank Aaron is, and will always be, a significant part of the Atlanta Braves and our proud legacy.  Our sincere hope is that the existing statue will continue to be preserved and displayed in a manner befitting his legacy as the greatest Brave of all time.”

Maria Saporta, Editor, is a longtime Atlanta business, civic and urban affairs journalist with a deep knowledge of our city, our region and state.  Since 2008, she has written a weekly column and news stories for the Atlanta Business Chronicle. Prior to that, she spent 27 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, becoming its business columnist in 1991. Maria received her Master’s degree in urban studies from Georgia State and her Bachelor’s degree in journalism from Boston University. Maria was born in Atlanta to European parents and has two young adult children.

8 replies
  1. PSW says:

    Typical Atlanta ethnocentric world-view, which I highly suspect was a contributing cause of the move in the first place, and which is why my time as claiming Atlanta as my hometown is over. 

    Once again, for those not getting it, and since support for contractual law and property rights is so situational for some in Atlanta anyway–regardless of who took actual ownership of statue when delivered, a.) I think it is very clear the intent of donors was for statute to be outside a *Braves* stadium, and not off by itself somewhere as a generic monument for the city. It is ethnic pride that causes AFCRA to wish to hold onto it–I don’t see it hankering after (pun intended) anything else related to the Braves. Including the Braves. I therefore alledge it is just ethnic pride–and I am not sure the AFCRA really cares about anything else but ethnic pride, which, once again, is perhaps how the team was lost. 

    Yes divisive comments for a divisive affair, but strongly felt. I am not for corporate coddling via stadium welfare, but the thing is–neither are the people of the City of Atlanta (as shown by their willingness to least entertain a stadium for the Hawks, as well as doing a refit (for about the same $250 million the Braves wanted), beyond the issue of seeing how quickly they can tear down black churches for the Falcons). So, there is a reason the Braves aren’t in the city, and I am forced to conclude it has to a lot to do with “we don’t want their kind anyhow, so we ain’t going to do much for you.” All I know is if the Braves had tried to tear down two churches, I am not quite so sure it would have gone so politely. 

    A pox upon this city, center of the new hypocrisy.  

    Have at it.Report

    Reply
  2. Jonathan Keith says:

    The Atlanta Braves care neither for their fans or for their history. Leaving the statue behind (where it should stay) is a loss prevention move. Profit over fans.Report

    Reply
  3. mnst says:

    PSW No one has any idea what you are talking about. The monument was donated to the city of Atlanta, and that’s exactly where Hank Aaron himself said it should stay, and so it will.Report

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

What are your thoughts?