<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Environmentalists cautiously optimistic on water plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saportareport.com/blog/2009/12/environmentalists-cautiously-optimistic-on-water-task-force-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saportareport.com/blog/2009/12/environmentalists-cautiously-optimistic-on-water-task-force-plan/</link>
	<description>Maria Saporta is a longtime Atlanta business, civic and urban affairs journalist with a deep knowledge of our city, our region and state.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:18:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://saportareport.com/blog/2009/12/environmentalists-cautiously-optimistic-on-water-task-force-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3097</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saportareport.com/blog/?p=2711#comment-3097</guid>
		<description>This is in rebuttal to Dose of Reality&#039;s comment.

1. Florida and Alabama do not have more-than-enough water. Flows in the Apalachicola River have been perilously low in recent years, and this can be attributed in part to increased consumption in Metropolitan Atlanta.

2. The water is not rightfully Atlanta&#039;s. The water belongs to all users in the watershed and the water should be managed on a system-wide basis. The water allocation formula should ensure adequate supplies of water, of an adequate quality, to all users in the basin to assure both ecologic and economic sustainability for the basin as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in rebuttal to Dose of Reality&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p>1. Florida and Alabama do not have more-than-enough water. Flows in the Apalachicola River have been perilously low in recent years, and this can be attributed in part to increased consumption in Metropolitan Atlanta.</p>
<p>2. The water is not rightfully Atlanta&#8217;s. The water belongs to all users in the watershed and the water should be managed on a system-wide basis. The water allocation formula should ensure adequate supplies of water, of an adequate quality, to all users in the basin to assure both ecologic and economic sustainability for the basin as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dose of Reality</title>
		<link>http://saportareport.com/blog/2009/12/environmentalists-cautiously-optimistic-on-water-task-force-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator>Dose of Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saportareport.com/blog/?p=2711#comment-3017</guid>
		<description>This &quot;solution&quot; is a joke.  Conservation - even if mandatory - would not result in anything close to the reduced levels that will be allowed under the 2012 guideline.  Furthermore, this demonstrates to AL and FL that they have the upper hand in limiting Atlanta&#039;s water supply.

The ultimate solution under the path this process is leading will be Alabama and Florida agreeing to &quot;sell&quot; part of their more-than-enough supply back to Atlanta - at a ridiculous premium.  And we&#039;ll end up paying other states for water that is already sitting in our reservoir.  

Purdue should be playing hardball, and should have assigned the task force to look at building another reservoir downstream of Lanier that would simply accept Lanier&#039;s output, and pump it right back up to Atlanta... the original authorization only placed guidelines on what Atlanta could withdraw from Lanier, but says nothing about what Atlanta can withdraw from further upstream or downstream of Lanier.

But Purdue seems consigned to just giving up water that not only powers the economic engine of the state, but is rightfully ours anyway.  Meanwhile Miami, Orlando, Tampa and Birmingham are all salivating at the idea of the price of metro Atlanta&#039;s utilities going through the roof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;solution&#8221; is a joke.  Conservation &#8211; even if mandatory &#8211; would not result in anything close to the reduced levels that will be allowed under the 2012 guideline.  Furthermore, this demonstrates to AL and FL that they have the upper hand in limiting Atlanta&#8217;s water supply.</p>
<p>The ultimate solution under the path this process is leading will be Alabama and Florida agreeing to &#8220;sell&#8221; part of their more-than-enough supply back to Atlanta &#8211; at a ridiculous premium.  And we&#8217;ll end up paying other states for water that is already sitting in our reservoir.  </p>
<p>Purdue should be playing hardball, and should have assigned the task force to look at building another reservoir downstream of Lanier that would simply accept Lanier&#8217;s output, and pump it right back up to Atlanta&#8230; the original authorization only placed guidelines on what Atlanta could withdraw from Lanier, but says nothing about what Atlanta can withdraw from further upstream or downstream of Lanier.</p>
<p>But Purdue seems consigned to just giving up water that not only powers the economic engine of the state, but is rightfully ours anyway.  Meanwhile Miami, Orlando, Tampa and Birmingham are all salivating at the idea of the price of metro Atlanta&#8217;s utilities going through the roof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watershed News: Perdue Talks Conservation &#171; Georgia Water Wire</title>
		<link>http://saportareport.com/blog/2009/12/environmentalists-cautiously-optimistic-on-water-task-force-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>Watershed News: Perdue Talks Conservation &#171; Georgia Water Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saportareport.com/blog/?p=2711#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>[...] to solve Georgia’s water woes, as reported in many media outlets (Atlanta Business Chronicle and SaportaReport).  The water negotiators are also talking about a culture of conservation as the most economic and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to solve Georgia’s water woes, as reported in many media outlets (Atlanta Business Chronicle and SaportaReport).  The water negotiators are also talking about a culture of conservation as the most economic and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
