Federal funding for transit, roads unclear as region ponders July vote on sales tax

By David Pendered

It’s now clear that the vote in metro Atlanta on the proposed 1 percent sales tax for transportation will occur with few clues from the federal government about its intention to pay for 12 percent of the work.

Federal funding now is in the region’s budget to pay for almost $847 million of the projects that are to be completed if voters approve the 10-year sales tax, which is to raise $6.14 billion in local dollars. The federal money appears throughout the region’s construction list.

But Congress did not pass a federal transportation bill last week, in advance of the March 31 expiration of the previous continuation funding bill. President Obama on Friday signed a 90-day continuation bill, which had been approved by the House and Senate, to forestall a shutdown of federally funded highway and transit projects.

The result is that Congress has until the end of June to resolve its philosophical differences over funding for highways and transit, a debate that now includes a call to eliminate the federal role in the nation’s highway and transit systems. On July 31, voters face the transportation sales tax referendum during the state’s primary election.

Federal funding is supposed to pay for three aspects of the planned transportation improvements that will be on the ballot. Here’s what they are, according to the project list approved in October by the Atlanta Regional Roundtable:

  • $693.9 million – committed to the project list by the Georgia Department of Transportation, from its anticipated federal funding;
  • $120 million – committed by the Atlanta Regional Commission from its anticipated federal funding;
  • $33 million – requested of the Atlanta Regional Commission, from its federal funds, to pay for Xpress bus service by GRTA, the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority.

The highway money covers a broad array of projects: $337.5 million of the $450 million cost of improving the interchange of I-285 and Ga. 400; $32.1 million of the $40.2 million cost of widening State Route 54 in Clayton County; $3.5 million of the $93 million cost of separating the grades of Windy Hill Road at U.S. 41 in Cobb County, a project associated with the widening and improving of Windy Hill Road from U.S. 41 to I-75 – a $27 million project which  is to receive $4 million in federal funds.

Click here to read more details in the ARC’s report.

The Georgia Department of Transportation has existed in this funding limbo for several years. The nation’s last long-term transportation bill expired in 2009.

“Obviously the continuing resolution helps to keep programs and projects afloat in the short term,” said GDOT spokesman David Spear. “But we have gone years now without a new multi-year authorization bill and that really is what is needed for the planning and construction to address Georgia’s long-term needs.”

MARTA’s board of directors has scheduled a meeting for Monday morning to discuss financial issues, in addition to corridor planning studies. The board previously has criticized a federal funding proposal that would have eliminated dedicated funding for transit systems across the country.

The issue of federal transportation funding faded from public view last week as the nation focused on the Supreme Court arguments over the National Health Care Act.

But a report in “Congressional Quarterly” describes how the House became unable to act on its own transportation bill, which was introduced in January, or on a Senate bill, which was passed in March with bipartisan support.

Part of the debate in the House included is whether the federal government should even be in the business of providing highways and transit, according to the story.

That issue was injected into the debate by Heritage Action for America. The group was formed in 2010 and its webpage describes it as a sister organization of the Heritage Foundation, which describes itself as a think tank that promotes conservative public policies.

Click here to read the story in “Congressional Quarterly.”

 

About David Pendered

David Pendered, Managing Editor, is an Atlanta journalist with nearly 30 years experience reporting on the region’s urban affairs, from Atlanta City Hall to the state Capitol. Since 2008, he has written for print and digital publications, and advised on media and governmental affairs. Previously, he spent more than 26 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and won awards for his coverage of schools and urban development. David graduated from North Carolina State University and was a Western Knight Center Fellow. David was born in Pennsylvania, grew up in North Carolina and is married to a fifth-generation Atlantan.
This entry was posted in David Pendered. Bookmark the permalink.
4 comments
writes_of_weigh
writes_of_weigh

The solution, as taxing as it is to discuss, IMHO, and with much trepidation on the part of all involved, seems quite simple, to this infra-dustrial observer. When one cares to glance back at the nation's history, there were plank roads proposed(privately funded) to link the coast with the inhospitable "back country", in places where paddle-wheel steamers couldn't navigate, and then came stage coach trails, the storied(and privately funded/protected) "Pony Express" trail, and then a vision to link the east to the west via federaly urged(and land granted) privately owned ribbons of iron and steel. As the rail mode grew on a nation that hungered for travel and adventure, gaps were mostly filled in by the likes of infra-dustrialists like James J. Hill, and  Henry M. Flagler, and in a Georgia vein, by New Jersey born Georgia transplant J.N. Pidcock and family. More recently, vast wealth controlled by modern infra-dustrialists like Warren Buffett, and Bill Gates whose investments not only in other business' such as insurance and software, but railroads as well, have been likened by at least one of them as an "all out bet" on the long term future of the U.S. economy, and railroads, in particular. To state in short order, the most effective transportation investments have been built with private capital and succeed, quite well, with a minimum of regulation, and just enough competition to keep them "on their toes", and in the case of the Flagler built Florida East Coast Railway, have proposed very recently, to construct privately owned high speed rail routes in Florida, to link the population centers/vacation destinations of Orlando and Miami. To continue to hand-wring over tight Federal and State transportation budgets and dream of HOV and HOT "projects"  that will "save the day" for gridlocked Georgians, is sheer serendipity. The "build it and they will come" mentality will keep those burdened with paying hard earned/spending(investing?)easily wasted tax dollars, feuding. These type projects, as history plainly shows, are best left to the likes of the Sage(Munger) and Oracle(Buffett) of Omaha, and their ilk. 

writes_of_weigh
writes_of_weigh

The solution, as taxing as it is to discuss, IMHO, and with much trepidation on the part of all involved, seems quite simple, to this infra-dustrial observer. When one cares to glance back at the nation's history, there were plank roads proposed(privately funded) to link the coast with the inhospitable "back country", in places where paddle-wheel steamers couldn't navigate, and then came stage coach trails, the storied(and privately funded/protected) "Pony Express" trail, and then a vision to link the east to the west via federaly urged(and land granted) privately owned ribbons of iron and steel. As the rail mode grew on a nation that hungered for travel and adventure, gaps were mostly filled in by the likes of infra-dustrialists like James J. Hill, and  Henry M. Flagler, and in a Georgia vein, by New Jersey born Georgia transplant J.N. Pidcock and family. More recently, vast wealth controlled by modern infra-dustrialists like Warren Buffett, and Bill Gates whose investments not only in other business' such as insurance and software, but railroads as well, have been likened by at least one of them as an "all out bet" on the long term future of the U.S. economy, and railroads, in particular. To state in short order, the most effective transportation investments have been built with private capital and succeed, quite well, with a minimum of regulation, and just enough competition to keep them "on their toes", and in the case of the Flagler built Florida East Coast Railway, have proposed very recently, to construct privately owned high speed rail routes in Florida, to link the population centers/vacation destinations of Orlando and Miami. To continue to hand-wring over tight Federal and State transportation budgets and dream of HOV and HOT "projects"  that will "save the day" for gridlocked Georgians, is sheer serendipity. The "build it and they will come" mentality will keep those burdened with paying hard earned/spending(investing?)easily wasted tax dollars, feuding. These type projects, as history plainly shows, are best left to the likes of the Sage(Munger) and Oracle(Buffett) of Omaha, and their ilk. 

The Last Democrat in Georgia
The Last Democrat in Georgia

 @writes_of_weigh

"To continue to hand-wring over tight Federal and State transportation budgets and dream of HOV and HOT "projects"  that will "save the day" for gridlocked Georgians, is sheer serendipity."

 

The powers-that-be pushing HOT lanes as a traffic congestion reduction strategy openly admit that the lanes are not meant to reduce overall congestion for all, but just those either with three or more occupants in the vehicle and those willing to pay adjustable tolls of increasing amounts to escape traffic jams from hell (see HOT lane use in California and it's virtual non-effect on traffic or the HOT lanes on I-85 and their NEGATIVE effects on traffic).

 

HOT lanes are basically the government's newest form of extortion of the public (..."You can escape these rush hour traffic jams from the sixth level of hades...For a price...)

The Last Democrat in Georgia
The Last Democrat in Georgia

 @writes_of_weigh "To continue to hand-wring over tight Federal and State transportation budgets and dream of HOV and HOT "projects"  that will "save the day" for gridlocked Georgians, is sheer serendipity."   The powers-that-be pushing HOT lanes as a traffic congestion reduction strategy openly admit that the lanes are not meant to reduce overall congestion for all, but just those either with three or more occupants in the vehicle and those willing to pay adjustable tolls of increasing amounts to escape traffic jams from hell (see HOT lane use in California and it's virtual non-effect on traffic or the HOT lanes on I-85 and their NEGATIVE effects on traffic).   HOT lanes are basically the government's newest form of extortion of the public (..."You can escape these rush hour traffic jams from the sixth level of hades...For a price...)