Atlanta’s planned homeless program raises issues of profits for providers, moving homeless west of downtown

By David Pendered

Who will profit from Atlanta’s new programs to reduce homelessness? Will the homeless be moved to dwellings in blighted neighborhoods west of downtown Atlanta? What will happen to the homeless shelter at the corner of Peachtree and Pine streets?

These central questions arose in a discussion Tuesday about Atlanta’s proposal to create a non-profit organization to take over the city’s federal and state funding that’s intended to reduce homelessness.

This dwelling off Hollywood Road appears similar to a single family home. It actually is a two-story duplex, fully rented at $2,600 a month, and is for sale priced at $75,000. Credit: homes.seegeorgiarealestate.com

This dwelling off Hollywood Road appears similar to a single family home. It actually is a two-story duplex, fully rented at $2,600 a month, and is for sale priced at $75,000. Credit: homes.seegeorgiarealestate.com

No solid answers were provided before the proposal to create the non-profit was approved unanimously by the Atlanta City Council’s Community Development Committee and sent to the council for a vote June 3. The mayor retains considerable influence over the planned non-profit.

Specifically, the mayor will appoint the chair and a voting majority of members to a temporary board that is to establish a non-profit organization to manage the city’s program to reduce homelessness.

Once a permanent board is established, by June 1, 2014, the mayor will appoint the chair and a voting majority of members to the permanent board.

The Community Development Committee reined the mayor’s influence by amending the legislation. The amendment has three components:

  1. The council will confirm the mayor’s appointee to serve as chair;
  2. The council will select one of its members to serve on the board;
  3. The board, both the interim and permanent, will provide quarterly reports to the council.

Councilmember Cleta Winslow raised the issue of profits. She observed that service providers will profit from contracts awarded by the planned non-profit organization that is to select providers and decide whether they perform well enough to keep their contracts.

“Since we’re talking about money, people are going to be lined up,” Winslow said.

Councilmember Ivory Lee Young Jr. raised the question of whether the new non-profit will seek to have its contractors establish dwellings for the homeless in blighted neighborhoods. Young said he routinely hears of developers who have their eyes on turning vacant apartment complexes into housing for the homeless.

Developers have gone into struggling neighborhoods and built a number of structures that appear to be large houses, but actually are duplex, quadruplexes, and sometimes even rooming houses: A central hallway leads to single rooms that may have a bath and kitchen, or may share them.

Areas such as Hollywood Road, in northwest Atlanta, were developed this way before the city became aware of the trend and sought to curb it before the recession.

Councilmember Kwanza Hall brought up the question of the homeless shelter at Peachtree and Pine, which is operated by the Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless.

“How will all this stuff we’re talking about address the corner of Peachtree and Pine,” Hall asked.

Hall continued his question by asking about effect of the new program on people who appear to be homeless and loiter in parking lots, and the feeding program offered by various groups.

Kristin Canavan Wilson, who oversees the innovation team funded by a grant from Bloomberg Philanthropies, said the types of programs Hall cited are not typically funded through the federal program.

This new program to reduce homelessness appears to spell the end of a decade-long regional effort that was devised at the urging of then Mayor Shirley Franklin.

The hope was to involve communities throughout metro Atlanta in addressing a persistent national dilemma that, in this region, focused on the central city because of the presence of Grady Memorial Hospital and a plethora of social services.

Back then, the United Way Regional Commission on Homelessness emerged as a staunch advocate in an effort to address homelessness as a regional issue and advocate of a central facility now known as the Gateway Center.

This coalition has frayed over time. DeKalb County, once a partner with Atlanta and Fulton County, has announced that it’s pulling out and intends to exercise more control over programs for its homeless population.

Consequently, Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed’s administration has proposed placing the city in charge of a new non-profit organization that will provide services in the city and unincorporated Fulton County.

 

About David Pendered

David Pendered, Managing Editor, is an Atlanta journalist with nearly 30 years experience reporting on the region’s urban affairs, from Atlanta City Hall to the state Capitol. Since 2008, he has written for print and digital publications, and advised on media and governmental affairs. Previously, he spent more than 26 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and won awards for his coverage of schools and urban development. David graduated from North Carolina State University and was a Western Knight Center Fellow. David was born in Pennsylvania, grew up in North Carolina and is married to a fifth-generation Atlantan.
This entry was posted in David Pendered and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
2 comments
bobcramer
bobcramer

Thank you for the fine article, David.

I guess we can chalk up former Mayor Shirley Franklin’s 10-year plan to end homelessness (“the Regional Commission on Homelessness”) to another one of her administration’s expensive failures as her timetable has come and gone and we are no closer to a viable solution.

Interestingly, a big part of her plan was to get “tough” with the Metro-Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, the little non-profit that still runs Peachtree-Pine, the largest homeless-friendly building in the city and the southeast.  In the process, she not only severely wounded one of our community’s finest social service providers, she drained money away from a well-established non-profit service eco-system to fund her failed commission while purposely limiting or denying services to thousands of vulnerable homeless people.

With that poor track record, it probably is not a wise move to give our existing Mayor all of this new authority.  While Kasim Reed seems like a fine man, city governments as the Franklin administration proved are not great providers of human services.  In many cases, city policies make matters much worse for homeless people.  To then give them control fixing these problems creates demonstrable conflicts of interest.  We need independent groups to provide healthy balance, a yin and yang, to create effective policies. 

Mayor Reed has shown little interest in homelessness during his first term, except to advocate for new panhandling ordinances, a failed policy that we just keep retreading every five years or so.  I am afraid that the Mayor’s new power grab will continues Atlanta’s history of failure to properly take care of its homeless people, and once again avoid the tough discussions about affordable housing, mental healthcare, and controversial zoning issues, to name a few. Mayors running for re-election are particularly vulnerable to the whims of the electorate, and homeless people and their advocates usually don’t have a strong voice or a fair shot.  Before it is too late, I encourage the City Council to rethink its latest approach.

Bob Cramer

Former Board Chairman

Metro-Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless

bobcramer
bobcramer

Thank you for the fine article, David. I guess we can chalk up former Mayor Shirley Franklin’s 10-year plan to end homelessness (“the Regional Commission on Homelessness”) to another one of her administration’s expensive failures as her timetable has come and gone and we are no closer to a viable solution. Interestingly, a big part of her plan was to get “tough” with the Metro-Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, the little non-profit that still runs Peachtree-Pine, the largest homeless-friendly building in the city and the southeast.  In the process, she not only severely wounded one of our community’s finest social service providers, she drained money away from a well-established non-profit service eco-system to fund her failed commission while purposely limiting or denying services to thousands of vulnerable homeless people. With that poor track record, it probably is not a wise move to give our existing Mayor all of this new authority.  While Kasim Reed seems like a fine man, city governments as the Franklin administration proved are not great providers of human services.  In many cases, city policies make matters much worse for homeless people.  To then give them control fixing these problems creates demonstrable conflicts of interest.  We need independent groups to provide healthy balance, a yin and yang, to create effective policies.  Mayor Reed has shown little interest in homelessness during his first term, except to advocate for new panhandling ordinances, a failed policy that we just keep retreading every five years or so.  I am afraid that the Mayor’s new power grab will continues Atlanta’s history of failure to properly take care of its homeless people, and once again avoid the tough discussions about affordable housing, mental healthcare, and controversial zoning issues, to name a few. Mayors running for re-election are particularly vulnerable to the whims of the electorate, and homeless people and their advocates usually don’t have a strong voice or a fair shot.  Before it is too late, I encourage the City Council to rethink its latest approach. Bob Cramer Former Board Chairman Metro-Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless

Trackbacks

  1. […] focused first on homeless veterans. Mayor Kasim Reed also recently announced the creation of a nonprofit, overseen by board members who will be appointed mostly by him, that would help address the […]