By Maria Saporta
First of a two-part series on current plans for the Atlanta BeltLine. This week: the Southwest leg.
Just for the record, I’m a huge fan of the Atlanta BeltLine and I’m a huge fan of transit.
That said, I also become somewhat irrational when I become aware of plans to cut down a significant number of trees in our city. It goes without saying that Atlanta is a beautiful city largely because of our extensive tree cover — an asset that is threatened on a continual basis.
One of the reasons I have been so enamored with the Atlanta BeltLine has been because it has been presented to us as an “Emerald Necklace” encircling our inner city — a linear park connecting larger urban parks.
So imagine my surprise, and dismay, when I recently walked the southwest corridor of the Atlanta BeltLine and realized that in one of the most forested parts of the 22-mile corridor, hundreds of trees — many of them mature trees — would be cut down to make room for a proposed transit line as well as the multipurpose trail.
Here is the rationale. The Atlanta BeltLine has received an $18 million TIGER V grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation to develop a 2.5 mile portion of the BeltLine in the southwest corridor.
The purpose of the grant is to prepare the corridor for a future streetcar as well as to build out much of the southwest trail. Because the corridor is quite narrow in some spots, the 14-foot wide trail will veer off the existing rail bed (where the streetcar is slated to go) and travel through the woods — causing hundreds of trees to be cut in its path.
The Atlanta BeltLine representatives, who did not want to be interviewed for this column, have said they will be planting more trees than they will be cutting down.
But as someone who loves trees — especially those that have grown undisturbed for decades — I know it takes a really long time for a newly-planted tree to replace the environmental contributions of a mature tree.
Greg Levine, co-executive director and chief program officer for Trees Atlanta, defended the Atlanta BeltLine.
“They truly want to save as many trees as possible,” Levine said. “The eastside trail had fewer trees, and it had a wider girth. The westside is much more challenging. It’s narrower.”
Trees Atlanta and the Atlanta BeltLine have partnered to turn the entire corridor into an Arboretum that celebrates our city’s trees, which appears to be a little ironic when looking at plans to cut down hundreds of trees for the sake of the project.
“If you are going to have transit, you are going to lose a lot of trees,” Levine said. “And that’s not my issue. I have to believe that there has been some logical thought behind that.”
Several months ago, the designers of the BeltLine had presented southwest corridor plans to the community when they were at the 25 percent stage. At that point, plans showed many more trees still standing. And then, a couple of weeks ago, plans at the 60 percent stage were presented that showed many fewer trees — decisions and changes being made with little to no community input.
Levine said he had not had a chance to see the plans at 60 percent until a concerned community person — Angel Poventud — had showed them to him.
So if the city’s No. 1 tree advocate had not been consulted on these changes, it leads me to believe that we need to have more eyes looking at the decisions being made — especially when it comes to saving as many trees as possible.
On a project as complicated as the Atlanta BeltLine, it is all about finding a balance between the development of trails, transit, residences, retail, office, parks and community amenities. It also is about the sequencing of all those amenities and being sure that we are not making irreversible decisions today based on false assumptions.
For example, the BeltLine streetcar plan shows that the next phase would be built along the southwest and eastside corridors. Currently, there is no money in place for either. It is not known if or when that funding will be made available.
But because the Atlanta BeltLine has to plan for transit down the road, it must locate the multipurpose trail, for which it currently has money, through stretches of tree-covered land. It does not want to build a trail, even if it’s temporary, in the rail bed because if and when transit funding becomes available, it would have to be redone. Plus the federal government would frown on such a double expense.
Also, there is the valid issue of equity. Residents in the southwest corridor have not seen significant investment in their community. PATH did develop the beautiful Lionel Hampton trail, which is where the southwest corridor begins on the northern edge.
Yet there is the valid question of whether the low density population in the area could support a streetcar line. And there is also the question of whether cutting down hundreds of trees — which bring so much beauty to the area — is in the community’s best interest.
Lastly, there is the issue of the urban farm. One of the more exciting projects along the Atlanta BeltLine is the development of an urban farm. At least it was exciting until a decision was made that all the trees along one edge of the property would have to be cut down to make room for the trail and to make the urban farm big enough. When plans were at 25 percent, the trees were still there. But now when the plans are at 60 percent, all the trees on that side of the BeltLine are slated trees are to be cut down. Really?
As I said earlier, I become almost irrational when I realize that hundreds of trees are about to be cut down. Always I’m told that it’s for some greater, long-term good.
Maybe, or maybe not.
In my heart of hearts, based on all my decades of living in Atlanta, I know we can and should do better.
If we make it a top priority, we CAN save more trees — and we all will be better off in the long run.
Next week: looking at the proposed phases to expand the Atlanta Streetcar.