By David Pendered
The federal government has made it official: It will not take a position in the federal lawsuit Florida filed against Georgia over Georgia’s consumption of water from the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint river basin. What’s of note is that the federal government is changing the rules of how the water in the basin is managed.
The U.S. Justice Department said in a brief filed Dec. 15 to say it’s not taking sides in the long-running dispute over water laws that control the eastern United States – once viewed as rich in water resources:
- “The United States takes no position on whether Florida has proved that a consumption cap would produce enough additional basin inflow at the right times to redress Florida’s alleged harm and justify the cost of imposing a consumption cap in this case.”
Meantime, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is in the process of updating the manual it uses to manage five dams that control water flow through the river basin – from north Georgia to the Gulf of Mexico. The manual hasn’t been updated in more than 50 years.
An interim manual was released in 2012. But a full-throated update of the manual wasn’t released until last week in the Federal Register. After a 30-day period of comment and review, it is expected to be implemented by March 2017. The update was not initially portrayed as relevant to the case. The special master disagreed and called on the Justice Department to produce a brief.
This manual is crucial in the debate over the amount of water that ultimately flows into Apalachicola Bay, on Florida’s Gulf of Mexico coastline southwest of Tallahassee.
The manual determines the amount of water that is to be retained in each of the five reservoirs. The manual and related documents determine the amount of water that is to flow from the Jim Woodruff Dam into the Apalachicola River, which empties into the Apalachicola Bay. Woodruff Dam is located at the confluence of the Flint and Chattahoochee rivers, where it creates Lake Seminole near Chattachoochee, Fl.
In short, the manual is central to Florida’s claim that a cap on Georgia’s water usage from the basin would right the wrongs Florida cites in its lawsuit.
And that’s why lawyers for both Florida and Georgia argued so vehemently over how the corps will use the manual to control water flow from dams down the river basin. The manual speaks directly to Florida’s claim that a cap on Georgia’s water usage will result in more water flowing into Apalachicola Bay.
As the federal brief noted:
- “At trial, the parties sharply disputed, with conflicting expert testimony, whether additional flow in the Flint River produced by a consumption cap on Georgia would increase the flow into the Apalachicola River or would instead be ‘offset’ by the Corps’ operation of the federal projects on the Chattahoochee River for their authorized purposes.”
- “In response, the Special Master requested that the United States also address ‘the extent to which (if at all) the [final environmental impact statement] and [Water Control Manual] materially changes the operations of the Corps as presented by the parties during the recently completed evidentiary hearing.’”
The Justice Department responded Dec. 15 with the statement that it will not express opinion. The ruling is the latest filed in the docket.