The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming, and no one seems to care

By Tom Baxter

Here are a few things which have happened in the world since the U.S. elections three weeks ago.

— In Bulgaria, a political newcomer who is friendly with the Russians, Gen. Rumen Radev, defeated Tsetska Tsacheva, the chairwoman of the National Assembly, in that nation’s presidential election.

— In Moldova, Igor Doldon, the pro-Russian leader of the Socialist Party, won the Nov. 13 presidential election, but his opponent, former Education Secretary Maia Sandu, is appealing the results to the nation’s Supreme Court, claiming Moldovans abroad were unfairly shut out.

— In Estonia’s complicated election process, the Russian-leaning Centre Party gained strength. The Economist reports that civilian armed militias are already training in anticipation of a Russian invasion.

— In Montenegro, a pro-Russian mercenary has begun cooperating with authorities and claims that Russian agents were working on a plan to seize the nation’s parliament building, kill the prime minister, and install a new government hostile to NATO.

— To their east, the Russian Navy has moved anti-ship missiles into its positions in the Kuril Islands, which it disputes with Japan.

— On the westernmost tip of their border, the Russians have begun deploying three new types of nuclear missiles capable of striking Berlin and other European cities in Kaliningrad.

— The Russians have carried out the first successful test of the intercontinental ballistic missiles which will be carried on their new, mobile “nuclear train” system. They also have carried out a huge civil preparedness exercise involving the training for a possible evacuation of 40 million people.

We seem to have a selective memory when it comes to the Cold War. A sequence of events that would have turned Walter Cronkite ashen-faced has gone largely unreported in the United States. And there’s a striking contrast between the high dudgeon into which many conservatives have gotten themselves over the tepid remarks by Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau on the death of Fidel Castro, and the strange indifference to a dictator just as ruthless, and much younger, than the one they’re about to bury in Havana.

We thought the Cold War was ideological, and when the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union broke up — when the capitalist model had triumphed over the communist model — we thought it was over. That communist regimes remained solidly in place in ascendent China and Vietnam carried little weight, because they conformed to the capitalist economy.

It would be a profound mistake to assume that the Cold War’s losers, particularly those, like Vladimir Putin, who picked up the pieces of the old system after its collapse, see it the same way.

Putin has described the collapse of the Soviet Union as a “major geopolitical disaster” of the 20th Century, in particular because “tens of millions of our co-citizens and co-patriots found themselves outside Russian territory.” That Putin has made himself one of the world’s richest men on the bones of the old Soviet system doesn’t diminish his desire to see his country return to its imperial inclinations. Those predate Lenin.

Two separate groups of researchers have now confirmed that the Russians used a sophisticated system of botnets, human “trolls” and social media networks to disseminate fake news in an attempt to impact the U.S. election. The only real debate about this is over how effective the propaganda effort was.

Experts are in agreement that the tactics used this year are based on doctrines that were unaffected by the fall of the Soviet Union. Like those nuke trains, a lot of Cold War ideas never went out of vogue in Russia.

“The Kremlin’s information warfare generally, is not the result of any theoretical innovation. All of the underlying concepts and most of the techniques were developed by the Soviet Union decades ago,” modern-day Kremlin watcher Maria Snegovaya has written.

“This was their standard mode during the Cold War. The problem is that this was hard to do before social media,” noted Clint Watts, a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. Now that it’s working, we can expect a lot more of it.

Gradually over time, we have allowed our preoccupation with an enemy capable of knocking down a couple of skyscrapers in New York to eclipse any concerns about an embittered old foe capable of incinerating the Eastern Seaboard. But Putin and his followers have not forgotten that they can.

Of course, it’s a different world. If nuclear missiles were to strike New York and Los Angeles today, they would kill an awful lot of Russians. Given their history, we should take scant comfort in that.

Tom Baxter has written about politics and the South for more than four decades. He was national editor and chief political correspondent at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and later edited The Southern Political Report, an online publication, for four years. Tom was the consultant for the 2008 election night coverage sponsored jointly by Current TV, Digg and Twitter, and a 2011 fellow at the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. He has written about the impact of Georgia’s and Alabama's immigration laws in reports for the Center for American Progress. Tom and his wife, Lili, have three adult children and seven grandchildren.

3 comments
Ben Bryant
Ben Bryant

Are you an old school cold warrior? Russia's response has to do with NATO's continuing encroachment onto their territory.

atlman
atlman

Yawn. The left is much more concerned about Russia now than they ever were during the Cold War, back when the left was convinced that the Soviets and communism would win out because it was the inevitable progress of human evolution (Google materialist concept of history) and that the only real danger was from conservatives who would try to destroy the world because they did not want to live in one where everyone would be equal to them ... indeed movies such as Dr. Strangelove and Spies Like Us were about how Reagan, McCarthy and other cold warriors would use nuclear weapons once they realized that their battle against communism was futile. 


If the left showed more concern about communism back when it actually was a threat to take over the world back when they were using their propaganda, cash and weapons in an attempt to get all of the former colonies in Latin America, Asia, Africa and the Middle East to refuse to sell NATO valuable raw materials and block off trade routes - which would have quickly caused the economic collapse of the NATO countries - then it would be much easier to actually care about the left getting angry at Putin over his insulting Obama (which is when the Putin bashing started when he used racist slurs against Obama during the Sochi winter Olympics) and helping elect Trump. Yes, Putin helped elect Trump. But please remember how much influence the Soviet Union had over a ton of leftist movements in America for decades! Lots of left-liberal and progressive movements in the United States received a ton of financial and strategic support from the Soviet Union dating as far back as the 1930s. Who knows what labor, civil rights, feminist, environmental and other movements would have looked like had it not been for the Soviet influence, and that speaks nothing of the development of Hollywood. Back then the Soviet influence was denied - or even defended - but now that the Soviet economic and ideological system has been all but discredited (Russia is now a plutocracy rather than a communist state, and the China model is now where all of the remaining communist states except North Korea are favoring) and the nuclear hostilities are all but abated (remember when the left wanted the NATO to UNILATERALLY divest itself of nuclear weapons knowing full well that the Soviets would never follow suit) we are supposed to get all hot and bothered about Russia using Facebook to help cause Hillary Clinton to lose an election? Never mind that had Hillary Clinton, I don't know, ACTUALLY BOTHERED TO CAMPAIGN IN WISCONSIN AND IOWA she might have still won anyway? Or had Clinton not used a private email server she may have still won anyway? Even Obama stated that Clinton should have used the state department's email server and should not have relied so much on identity politics strategy during her campaign. 


When the Soviets were helping the left organize and fundraise and providing them with ideology, they were fine. Now that they are causing the Democrats to lose elections, they are bad. Never mind that they were far more dangerous on a global scale when they were helping the left then than they are now. It really shows the mentality of you guys on the left, and why I really can't be upset that Putin helped Hillary lose.

Burroughston Broch
Burroughston Broch

Democrats are looking for scapegoats in which to blame their election losses rather than looking in the mirror and acknowledging the obvious.

By blaming Putin they also hope to mask his gelding of our weak and ineffectual President Obama.