ATL mayoral campaign: Mitchell says he supports inclusionary zoning

By David Pendered

Atlanta City Council President Ceasar Mitchell, a candidate for mayor, said Wednesday he supports inclusionary zoning, a regulation to require future residential developments to be mixed-income communities.

Ceasar Mitchell

Ceasar Mitchell

“Consider me a resource, consider me an ally,” Mitchell said at the quarterly meeting of the Regional Housing Forum, an affiliate of the Atlanta Regional Commission.

Advocates of inclusionary zoning thought until recently they were close to convincing Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed and the council to adopt inclusionary zoning legislation. Invest Atlanta, the city’s development arm that’s chaired by the mayor, had examined the issue for about a year. However, the issue appears to have evaporated without further ado.

That’s why Mitchell’s comments drew such a warm response from a group gathered to wage a campaign for Atlanta to enact inclusionary zoning legislation.

“You cannot have a city, a healthy city, of 1.3 million if you don’t have affordable housing,” Mitchell said. “We have to come up with a very strong, definitive and consistent policy. I believe that is inclusionary zoning. It’s going to take serious conversations across neighborhoods, across communities, to get this across the finish line.”

Mandatory inclusionary zoning would require all new residential developments to provide a number of homes affordable to those with low and moderate incomes.

The result would be mixed-income communities somewhat like Atlanta’s existing high-rise condominiums, where home prices rise with the altitude of the apartment.

mary norwood

Mary Norwood

Atlanta Councilmember Mary Norwood, who is elected citywide and has not broadcast her campaign plans for 2017, spoke before Mitchell and focused on other pieces of the housing affordability issue.

“Let’s make sure we can do an employer-assisted workforce housing component, so you can live closer to where you work,” Norwood said. “We have a whole lot of housing in this town that’s near MARTA, and we have to think about how people can get close to their work.”

The two elected officials spoke right after Bruce Gunter unveiled a new campaign that intends to raise money to provide and preserve the stock of homes in Atlanta affordable to folks who earn a schoolteacher’s salary.

The main strategy is: Follow the money and secure the money.

Gunter, who’s developed affordable housing for more than two decades, said the campaign has to be laser focused in order to achieve its goal.

“There are 100 tangents we could go off on,” Gunter said. “Let’s follow the money.”

It’s going to take a lot of money to move the needle on the number of affordable homes in the city.

Developers rejected offers of $40,000 per unit in 2008, when Atlanta BeltLine’s now-depleted housing fund had a balance of $8.8 million, said James Alexander, the BeltLine’s housing policy director.

condo construction, washington d.c.

The inclusionary zoning regulation in Washington, D.C. requires that 8 percent to 10 percent of floor area in new developments, and some renovations, be set aside as affordable units, as is the case in this project at Mount Vernon Square. Credit: flickr.com

“Most said ‘no’ to that number,” Alexander said. “They were closer to $80,000 to $90,000 a unit.

The working draft of campaign’s business plan says the mission is to garner “substantial new resources” for producing and preserving affordable housing with three outcomes:

  • “Adoption of mandatory inclusionary zoning legislation;
  • “Creation of a housing trust fund (or opportunity) fund with a dedicated or renewable capital source;
  • The long-term stewardship and preservation of affordable housing units by a public or non-profit entity to achieve longer or perpetual periods of affordability.”

The Atlanta City Council now requires a number of affordable homes to be built in any residential development inside the city limits that receives any governmental subsidies – be they from Atlanta, Fulton or DeKalb counties.

Many of the luxury apartments recently built or under construction in Buckhead were subsidized by Fulton’s development authority, according to presentations made when the council was considering adopting the inclusionary housing proposal.

The campaign already has identified its target audience – Atlanta’s officials. While a broad campaign is planned:

  • “Emphasis, however, is on mayoral candidates, city councilmembers, and people who influence them as our end goal is legislation and commitment of public resources.”

“It’s not just lofty goals, it’s going to be a campaign,” said Bill Boling, the retired founder of Atlanta Community Food Bank, the forum’s moderator, and a chief advocate of the campaign.

David Pendered, Managing Editor, is an Atlanta journalist with more than 30 years experience reporting on the region’s urban affairs, from Atlanta City Hall to the state Capitol. Since 2008, he has written for print and digital publications, and advised on media and governmental affairs. Previously, he spent more than 26 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and won awards for his coverage of schools and urban development. David graduated from North Carolina State University and was a Western Knight Center Fellow. David was born in Pennsylvania, grew up in North Carolina and is married to a fifth-generation Atlantan.

4 replies
  1. Burroughston Broch says:

    A city of 1.3 million? What were the refreshments served at the meeting?
    Let’s assume that ARC’s estimate of 450,000 is correct for the 2020 Census. That would be a 7.14% increase in 10 years. If sustained, that increase would produce a city of 1.3 million – in 160 years.Report

    Reply
  2. dfe says:

    This is a number that a city consultant came up with using an assumption that the city will capture 50% of the metro growth going forward. (Some) consultants will produce a projection that you pay them to produce. If the city can capture even 20% of metro growth over time that would be a lot. There are ample reasons to suspect that a goal of maybe 600,000-700,000 over 20 years is ambitious. For one thing the city is not addressing the many problems that affect 2/3 of the city – abandoned buildings and schools being high on the list. We cannot cram 800,000 people into 1/3 of the city.Report

    Reply
  3. Burroughston Broch says:

    No matter what the City paid this consultant, they paid too much. The consultant’s assumption is absurd. The City will have accomplished much if it recovers to its 1970 population of 498,000 in 20 years.Report

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

What are your thoughts?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.