Georgia may not even get crumbs for high-speed rail

By Maria Saporta
Friday, February 19, 2010

When the Obama administration doled out $8 billion in high-speed rail grants last month, Georgia watched Florida get $1.25 billion and North Carolina get $545 million for high-speed rail projects.

All Georgia received was a planning grant for $750,000 to study the feasibility of three high-speed rail lines — Atlanta to Birmingham; Atlanta to Chicago (through Tennessee) and a third from Macon to Jacksonville.

But there was hitch.

Because the $750,000 was for a planning study, the federal government requires a local match of $750,000. That 50/50 local match apparently had not been included in the state budget.

And so far, the state does not have the funds in place to meet the matching requirement.

“We cannot use motor fuel money to match the rail grants,” explained Karlene Barron, a spokeswoman for the Georgia Department of Transportation, in an e-mail. “Knowing that money from the general funds might not be appropriated by the legislature given the current economic situation, we have been working on other alternatives to find the match.”

Barron said that GDOT Commissioner Vance Smith “spearheaded” a meeting last month with the transportation commissioners of Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and Florida to begin talks on “forming a coalition aimed at finding ways to fully implement high-speed rail in the corridor.”

Also, Barron said that Erik Steavens, GDOT’s director of intermodal programs, has been “actively engaged in collaborating with local stakeholders along the corridor who have a vested interest” in high-speed rail in the region.

“We are also looking to the legislature and the governor for any assistance that he may provide,” Barron wrote in the e-mail. “So in summary, we are actively working on finding the funding for these grants.”

Georgia already had been criticized by federal transportation officials for not being better prepared to develop high-speed rail and support public transit. The states that did receive the high speed rail grants already had invested in their respective projects through plans and local financial support.

The $750,000 grant that Georgia received was called “crumbs” by some, but if Georgia is not able to secure a $750,000 local match, the state won’t even receive those crumbs.

Maria Saporta, Editor, is a longtime Atlanta business, civic and urban affairs journalist with a deep knowledge of our city, our region and state.  Since 2008, she has written a weekly column and news stories for the Atlanta Business Chronicle. Prior to that, she spent 27 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, becoming its business columnist in 1991. Maria received her Master’s degree in urban studies from Georgia State and her Bachelor’s degree in journalism from Boston University. Maria was born in Atlanta to European parents and has two young adult children.

1 reply
  1. Dick Hodges says:

    In most recent years, a failure of vision and political leadership regarding transportation in Georgia , aided and abetted by a largely lacadaisical, seemingly unconcerned, business community, now appears ready to haunt the future of metro Atlanta and much the rest of Georgia. It’s a future dependent on true transportation progress, encompassing virtually all transit modes,including various proven forms of passenge rail.
    After years of being reminded by individuals and organizations, generally without significant political, or businss, influence, transportation, as a subject needing to be addressed with knowledge, intelligence and “guts”, finally has made it to the priority table. But it has arrived there in the midst of a recession and a reduction of the resources that otherwise might help solve or alleviate transportation challenges in this area. Much credit for the progress that has been made on this topic goes to Maria Saporta and a few other talented columnists, editorial writers and reporters who recognize the “future is upon us”. Courage, wisdom, committment and desire for a future with continued economic progress and an improved quality of life for Georgians is needed now more than ever by those who could “make it happen.” We’ll soon find out one way or another whether those qualities truly characterize the “influentials” among us.Report

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

What are your thoughts?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.