Type to search

David Pendered

As auto sales rebound in Ga., new cars pay fewer taxes to build roads

Metro Atlanta on a morning commute

State funding to ease traffic congestion on metro Atlanta roads, as seen in this recent morning drive, is dwindling as vehicles become more efficient and use less fuel, thus reducing fuel tax revenues for Georgia. Credit: David Pendered

By David Pendered

An uptick in the sale of new vehicles that’s been linked to lower gas prices spells more trouble for state road funding.

Metro Atlanta on a morning commute

State funding to ease traffic congestion on metro Atlanta roads, as seen in this recent morning drive, is dwindling as vehicles become more efficient and use less fuel, thus reducing fuel tax revenues for Georgia. Credit: David Pendered

Georgia’s collection of motor fuel taxes fell by 2 percent in the last three months of 2014. Revenues from tag, title, and fees rose by 2.7 percent during that period, according to a tabulation of monthly reports from the Georgia Department of Revenue.

If the trend continues, an ever-increasing number of new, fuel efficient vehicles will be on the road sooner rather than later. While that’s good news for the auto industry, it’s bad news for the primary source of state revenues Georgia uses to build and maintain roads – a fuel tax collected on every gallon sold.

These figures and others will factor into this year’s debate in the Legislature over state transportation funding. Both Gov. Nathan Deal and a joint House-Senate study committee call for Georgia to raise more money for roads and transit.

The exact method for collecting that money is to be determined. The amount being discussed is staggering: At least $1 billion a year. To put that sum in perspective, it’s almost a fifth of Georgia’s entire budget for the fiscal year ending June 30 – $20.8 billion.

State revenue figures support the observations of auto dealers in the southeast in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Georgia revenues from fuel, vehicle sales

Georgia is recording a dwindling collection of fuel tax revenues even as revenues related to vehicle tags are rising. Credit: Ga. DOR, David Pendered

Dealers told the Federal Reserve that consumers jumped to buy big vehicles when fuel prices began a downward slide in late summer. Dealers began reporting a persistent uptick in sales in September, and by year’s end it had turned into a full-fledged boomlet.

The Fed included the following characterization of dealers’ comments in its description of economic conditions in the southeast, as reported in the Jan. 14 edition of the Beige Book from the Atlanta District:

  • “District auto dealers noted that customers were reacting immediately to lower gasoline prices by purchasing new, larger vehicles.”

These new vehicles will burn less fuel than almost anything they replace, according to federal estimates of minimum standards for fuel economy.

This will be especially true in the case of consumers who delayed a vehicle purchase as long as possible in the wake of the great recession.

The estimated minimum standard for a passenger car built in the U.S. in 2014 was 32.1 mpg. In comparison, the estimate was 31.4 mpg in 2012; 30.7 mpg in 2012; and 27.8 mpg in 2011.

These estimates are based market forecasts of the fleets manufactured in the U.S., according to a final ruling released by the federal Department of Transportation and Environmental Protection Agency.

Consider the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which autotrader.com says is in the Top 10 of most popular vehicles. Reported mpg estimates for the 2005 model were 17 city, 22 highway. The 2014 model had reported mileage estimates of 22 city, 30 highway.

Georgia no longer can rely on the federal government to pay for most of the state’s roads, bridges and other infrastructure. The days of the federal match have been waning for years, as Congress has been unable to compromise on a way to pay for transportation projects. The current federal transportation funding measure expires May 31.

Georgia is facing a $367.2 million shortfall in necessary federal transportation funds in the federal fiscal year that ends Oct. 1, the state’s chief engineer told GRTA’s board of directors at its Jan. 14 meeting.

David Pendered

David Pendered, Managing Editor, is an Atlanta journalist with more than 30 years experience reporting on the region’s urban affairs, from Atlanta City Hall to the state Capitol. Since 2008, he has written for print and digital publications, and advised on media and governmental affairs. Previously, he spent more than 26 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and won awards for his coverage of schools and urban development. David graduated from North Carolina State University and was a Western Knight Center Fellow.


You Might also Like


  1. JWK January 20, 2015 4:32 pm

    As a proud Red state, I can safely say that we don’t want that dirty Fed money to fix “our” roads. Just like we didn’t want that dirty money to fix “our” port either!!!
    Let the people who pay most of the taxes, you know those Blue-staters, keep their dirty money for a change.Report

  2. Adam March 7, 2022 6:22 am

    This is a great way to set the right taxes for the roads in order to maintain them efficiently. Now there are really more and more car sales, and more and more people contact companies like https://shipcar24.com/service/coast-to-coast-car-shipping to calculate the cost and deliver new cars to other citiesReport


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.