Type to search

Eleanor Ringel Cater

‘Oz: The Great and Powerful’ — new movie is neither great nor powerful

By Eleanor Ringel Cater

If it only had a brain.

A heart.

The noive.

Though, when you think about it, the makers of “Oz: The Great and Powerful” had some nerve when they chose to tamper with L. Frank Baum’s classic series of books about a land over the rainbow, ruled by a wizard and various witches.

That said, it seems odd so many reviewers are bringing up Judy Garland and 1939’s “The Wizard of Oz.”

It’s like evoking Woody Allen’s “Manhattan” while reviewing “Taxi Driver.” After all, both take place in New York City.

Sam Raimi, director of such estimable movies as “Evil Dead II,” “The Quick and the Dead” (check it out), the original “Spider-man” trio and “A Simple Plan,” has handed us a movie that is as visually bereft as it is dramatically inept.

It begins well with a clever homage to Garland’s classic. We are introduced to a two-bit magician (James Franco) who calls himself Oz (why? I have no idea; Baum took his fantastical land’s name from the O-Z side of his filing cabinet)

As in Victor Fleming’s earlier version, the movie starts out in black-and-white. Raimi even adds another clever touch: the screen is shaped like a huge square-ish TV from the 50s or 60s, which is how many of us first experienced Dorothy, Toto and the gang. In our homes, on television.

Anyway, Franco is a humbug and a hustler who specializes in gullible farm-girls. Another clever bit: one of his former conquests shows up at his tent to explain she’s getting married — to one John Gale (Dorothy’s last name is Gale).

Just as he’s about to get in big trouble with the circus strongman for stealing his music box, a tornado happens along and it’s up, up and away in the show’s hot-air balloon.

Next stop, Oz, in all its glorious color, where Franco doesn’t encounter a mob of Munchkins (that’s for later and they are a Rainbow Coalition, as befits the 21st Century). No, he lands

conveniently close to Theodora (a sadly subdued Mila Kuris), a stylish witch in black leather pants and a Kentucky Derby hat. At this point, she’s not a bad witch, just a good girl who wants to go bad (as in, kiss-kiss-bang-bang).

She also, to Franco’s considerable surprise, proclaims him Oz’s long-awaited Wizard and trots him off to the Emerald City to meet her sleek and certifiably bad-witch sister Evanora (Rachel Weisz, whose special brand of magic is to steal every scene she’s in).

The gullible Kuris and scheming Weisz, agree that Franco can only really, truly be Oz, the Great and Powerful, if he kills a “Wicked Witch” named Glinda (Michelle Williams, gamely charming her way though a non-existent part).

So, it’s off to see the Witch, with various companions — a garrulous flying monkey annoyingly voiced by Zack Graff; a cuter-than-Shirley-Temple porcelain doll (Joey King); some bloodthirsty flying baboons; and, as promised, a culturally diverse bunch of Munchkins, Quadlings and Tinkers.

If only you could understand how, gaudy, shameless and boring all of this is. How drenched in Hollywood vulgarity and calculation. How evoking the magic of movies (as Martin Scorsese did in “Hugo”) just seems like one more soulless trick.

The magic and wonder in “Oz The Great and Powerful” are the worst kind: curdled and self-conscious. One friend even wondered if Raimi had spoiled his own vision by bending over backwards to emulate that of producer Tim Burton.

Well, maybe. But Burton’s pretty much given up, too. The only recent movie to desecrate something important as badly as this one does is last year’s “Alice in Wonderland,” directed by, yes, Tim Burton.

Wicked witches (and warlocks) do exist. Most of them are sunning around someone’s pool in that under-the-rainbow gutter known as Hollywood.

Eleanor Ringel

Eleanor Ringel, Movie Critic, was the film critic for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution for almost 30 years. She was nominated multiple times for a Pulitzer Prize. She won the Best of Cox Critic, IMAGE Film & Video and Women In Film awards. An Atlanta native, she graduated from Westminster and Brown University. She was the critic on WXIA’s Noonday, a member of Entertainment Weekly's Critics Grid and wrote TV Guide’s movie/DVD. She is member of the National Society of Film Critics and currently talks about movies on WMLB and writes the Time Out column for the Atlanta Business Chronicle.



  1. D March 15, 2013 9:51 am

    * Mila Kunis
    * Zach BraffReport

  2. Jhanna March 17, 2013 12:38 am

    I think it’s time to move on with the future and enjoy the 2013verson of oz .iit was a great and entertaining movie ,many people were laughing out loud in the theatre .Report

  3. Lea March 17, 2013 12:51 am

    I enjoyed this movie and as for your review maybe you should watch it one more time so you get your facts correct.Report

    1. theo March 18, 2013 3:49 pm

      the movie is great as i went to the vue with my school to watch cat in paris( is french with english subtitles 🙁 )

      but there was no more tickets for that so we watched oz the great and powerful that was greatReport

  4. Amelia March 18, 2013 8:45 am

    I would have to completely agree with this review. The film as a whole felt bloated and drawn out to the point where I thought the public bathroom might be more entertaining. Now don’t get me wrong the begging scene is very good, I would have been happy had it finished there. Rather than spend another hour with flat jokes and CGI thrown in my face. The supposed “hero” of the film was beyond a selfish character, who only towards the few last scenes did he “change” and I use that loosely, as then a few minutes later he is off trying to seduce another female. As for a children’s film I expect better morals to be kept through the film, but with this wizard we are taught that if you device and cheat, its okay as long as your a man.

    The film as a whole reeks of money, with little to no originality. By the end I was just praying that the so called “wizard” and his very annoying sidekicks would be the ones to be caught under Dorothy’s rather heavy house. Now that’s an ending I would have gladly payed for.Report

  5. theo March 18, 2013 3:51 pm

    amelia must be blind or 50 years of ageReport

  6. Molly B. March 19, 2013 12:03 pm

    I wish people would learn their grammar, punctuation and spelling, and that Maria’s editor would do a better job with Eleanor’s piece. This review and the ensuing comments are all full of errors so their credibility is, for me, absent. What have we become that we can’t get down the basics of our language?Report

  7. Renee Beidler (@jreneeb) March 19, 2013 3:32 pm

    Yes, commenters, poor grammar and spelling do not lend validity to your opinion. Also, it is Mila KUNIS, not Kuris. I don’t know why I keep reading Cater’s reviews – they are all so negative. Tearing every movie apart does not make one a great critic.Report


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.