Southern Co. retains credit rating in part by selling assets exceeding $4.7 billion

By David Pendered

The Southern Co.’s aggressive sales of assets helped it retain its credit rating, despite financial losses at Georgia Power that relate to Plant Vogtle. Those losses prompted Moody’s Investors Service to downgrade Georgia Power’s credit rating.

Kemper IGCC

The Kemper IGCC project in Mississippi cost nearly three times the initial estimate, but now is a credit-positive for a subsidiary of the Southern Co. File/Credit: mississippipower.com

Moody’s issued guidance that affects over $30 billion of debt and credit facilities in a rating action released Wednesday.

The action also noted the positive impact resulting from steps taken by utility regulators to manage through the impact of the federal tax reform approved in 2017.

In an earnings call on Wednesday, Southern Co. Chairman, President and CEO Thomas Fanning outlined asset sales that have closed this year and two that are expected to close in 2019. The total value exceeds $4.7 billion:

  • “In May, we completed the sale of a 33 percent minority interest stake in Southern Power solar portfolio and we completed the sale of Pivotal Home Solutions in June. In July, we closed the sales of Elizabethtown Gas, Elkton Gas and Florida City Gas. Cumulatively, these transactions accounted for more than $3.7 billion in proceeds.
  • “We have completed the appropriate FERC [Federal Energy Regulatory Commission] filings for the sales of Gulf Power and Southern Power’s plants Stanton and Oleander. These regulatory approvals are expected to drive the timing for closing on these transactions. Our current expectation is that both transactions will close during the first half of 2019.
  • “We are also making great progress on third-party tax equity financing for the vast majority of Southern Power’s existing wind portfolio, which we expect to produce more than $1 billion in proceeds. We hope to close this transaction during the fourth quarter of 2018.”

These transactions were noted by Moody’s analysts, who observed in their rating action:

Thomas Fanning

Thomas Fanning

  • “The affirmation of Southern’s Baa2 rating reflects management’s pro-active efforts to strengthen the company’s balance sheet through equity issuances and asset sales, and the largely credit supportive actions taken by most of its state regulators in response to cash flow pressure at the utilities resulting from the passage of federal tax reform.
  • ”We view these positive developments as largely offsetting the latest negative developments at Georgia Power and the Vogtle project and sufficient to affirm Southern’s rating at Baa2.”

The rating action underscores the extent to which the utilities and their parent company are grappling with complications in construction projects.

The woes at Plant Vogtle are well known. Following the bankruptcy filing by Westinghouse, a major partner, Georgia Power is addressing workforce challenges that are likely to affect the ability to bring Vogtle’s two nuclear plants on line, in November 2021 and November 2022.

Brighter news has emerged from Mississippi Power. The company was on track to complete construction the Kemper Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle plant. It was on track to resolve cost recovery issues associated with the plant, and the received a $1 billion contribution from Southern.

The three events prompted Moody’s in September 2017 to declare the company’s credit outlook as stable.

In the rating action released Wednesday, Moody’s provided the following credit rating to Southern, Georgia Power and Mississippi Power:

  • “Medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.”

Alabama Power received a rating that is:

  • “Judged to be upper-medium grade and … subject to low credit risk.”

 

China, nuclear plants

A nuclear facility being built in China with the same design as the Westinghouse reactor at Plant Vogtle was to open in 2014. The first fuel was loaded in February, but stopped for ‘safety concerns’ and was started again in April. File/Credit: cnnc via world-nuclear-news.org

 

 

David Pendered, Managing Editor, is an Atlanta journalist with more than 30 years experience reporting on the region’s urban affairs, from Atlanta City Hall to the state Capitol. Since 2008, he has written for print and digital publications, and advised on media and governmental affairs. Previously, he spent more than 26 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and won awards for his coverage of schools and urban development. David graduated from North Carolina State University and was a Western Knight Center Fellow. David was born in Pennsylvania, grew up in North Carolina and is married to a fifth-generation Atlantan.

4 replies
  1. Robert Searfoss says:

    Almost out of sight but still outrageous is the monthly redirection, by surcharge, of school tax money, from school use, to build Vogtle.

    Vogtle good or bad is not this point. It is that school tax money should be used for school purposes, not for power company activities.

    The 2018 legislature dropped the ball on fixing this, maybe the 2019 will nerve-up and tell Georgia Power lobbyists to go away and quit protecting this stain that needs cleaning.Report

    Reply
  2. Chris Johnston says:

    The author fails to mention that Moody’s downgraded Georgia Power’s rating from A3 to Baa1 and increased its credit risk from low to moderate on the day this post was published.Report

    Reply
  3. Glenn Carroll says:

    “Woes at Plant Vogtle” do not necessarily translate into WOE$ for Georgia Power which posted $1.4 billion profit in 2017! Additionally, Georgia Power has requested $990 million in 2017 cost recovery for Vogtle construction from the Georgia Public Service Commission which is many times as much money as it has expended in any previous year on the project. They are financial wizards, and it sure would be great if some investigative reporting were to pull that curtain back. In other news reports this week, we see that drunkeness on the job is epidemic at Vogtle and that bad blueprints, faulty parts, and absent supplies are stopping work for 7,000 workers at the site. All for an outdated steam generation technology (nuclear power) that isn’t even needed (Georgia Power’s sales are 15% lower than when they pitched the reactors 10 years ago). So, why do they persist in building? See: $1.4 billion in profit in 2017 …Report

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

What are your thoughts?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.