The BeltLine as a resource for redressing Atlanta’s inequity

By Guest Columnist MICHAEL DOBBINS, professor of the practice at Georgia Tech’s School of City and Regional Planning, and former Atlanta planning commissioner

Atlanta has the opportunity and the means to begin to attack the most shameful and enduring blemish on its record among U.S. cities: Greatest wealth disparity (the GINI index) and least chance for low wealth families to climb out of poverty (Harvard-Berkeley study).

Instead of passively accepting or denying this decades-long stain, motivated leadership could take the problem on with a good chance of success. Modest goals, like climbing a few notches out of the cellar, are attainable, and wouldn’t that make this city proud?

There are enough big-ticket projects underway to make it happen.

Michael Dobins

Michael Dobbins

For one, the BeltLine (Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. or ABI) holds a great trove of resources. Their staff is large, skilled and well compensated. Their core funding comes from the city’s largest Tax Allocation District, in place for 10 years already. In addition, they have been able to raise considerable private and foundation funding through the private, non-profit sister agency, the Atlanta BeltLine Partnership (ABLP). More than half of their TAD territory is occupied or flanked by some of the city’s lowest wealth, highest unemployment neighborhoods, whose needs are often at the basic survival level. These are the neighborhoods whose demographics the BeltLine depended on in the first place to qualify for establishing the TAD under the state’s redevelopment powers law.

Yet most of the BeltLine resources to this point have been spent to build amenities and accelerate development that was already happening in the more affluent east and northeast sectors of the city, accounting for some two-thirds of the approximately $400 million spent.

Donald Lee Hollowell Parkway, MARTA

This MARTA bus stop on Donald Lee Hollowell Parkway, near Grove Park, is covered by storm water runoff and has no protection from vehicles passing on the four-lane road. (Photo: David Pendered)

 

Back in 2005, when the TAD was up for an approval vote by the Atlanta City Council, recognizing the potential for this kind of inequitable treatment in the priorities and use of funds for the BeltLine, last minute lobbying efforts by Georgia Stand-Up and concerned citizens called for the city’s enabling legislation to mandate a Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) and a set-aside for affordable housing.

The council imposed language to that effect. So far, though, there is little evidence of implementation of the CBA, particularly its emphasis on training and employing low wealth or unemployed citizens. And the affordable housing component languishes far short of its goals. Concerned, the council called for an “equitable development plan” in 2009.

Still frustrated with a lack of progress, in 2012 the Council called for an “equitable development plan assessment.” The BeltLine Partnership commissioned that report, which was indeed critical of the lack of equity that characterizes the BeltLine’s priorities and expenditures to date.

Donald Lee Hollowell Parkway, pedestrian

Pedestrians are a common site along Donald Lee Hollowell Parkway, which is a transit-dependent community near the Georgia Dome. (Photo: David Pendered)

According to the BeltLine’s 2013 Strategic Implementation Plan “dashboard,” those projects in the plan that could do the most good for low wealth people – jobs, housing, and streetscapes – are the worst performing elements of the program. So what could be done to address these mandated yet admittedly difficult goals?

Implement a jobs program in conjunction with all BeltLine design and construction activity.

In 2014, nine years after the approval of the TAD, the BeltLine Partnership, the private, non-profit BeltLine-support organization, has developed a health care workers training program with various partners, which has had some success. Recently, the partnership has joined with the Blank Foundation-sponsored Westside Works and state agencies to develop a construction training program.

The BeltLine itself, however, has done little for training or employment of unemployed people in its impact areas, despite the opportunity provided through contracting for tens of millions of dollars of design, consulting, and construction activity. Tenuous and token as they are, the BeltLine should build on and expand its sister organization’s initiatives to ensure that training, hiring, and compensation stipulations are incorporated in all of its design and build contracts. These should set specific targets and accountability measures for including people in the City’s low wealth neighborhoods.

Build infrastructure and spawn mixed income investment in impacted areas

There are many streets and sites within the TAD boundaries, not necessarily related to the trail path, for which committing to public infrastructure improvements in conjunction with and in support of redevelopment initiatives could jumpstart community-based revitalization.

Donald Lee Hollowell Parkway, sidewalk

This sidewalk along Donald Lee Hollowell Parkway is crowded by a used car lot and tilts down toward the street. (Photo: David Pendered)

 

Examples of the use of BeltLine resources that lie inside the BeltLine TAD and are consistent with its goals could include partnerships for revitalization along well traveled yet dismal corridors, like Northside, West Marietta, Donald Lee Hollowell, Joseph E. Boone, MLK, Westview, Ralph David Abernathy, Cascade, Deckner, Avon, Lawton, Peeples, Oakland, Lee, Murphy, Sylvan, Metropolitan, McDaniel, University, Pryor, Hank Aaron, and McDonough, among others. These projects are already included in the BeltLine’s Strategic Implementation Plan. The kinds of improvements that would benefit existing populations would include:

  • Coordinated with the city’s bond program, partner with MARTA, the city, Georgia Department of Transportation, and development entities to make streetscape improvements to include sidewalks and crosswalks, bus shelters with real time schedule information, lighting, cameras, tree planting, bike lanes, and access control measures (limiting driveways) ;
  • Partner for housing and community development revitalization with redevelopment entities along the corridors, like the Fulton County/Atlanta Land Bank Authority, Invest Atlanta, Georgia Stand-Up, AFL-CIO, Atlanta Community Land Trust, Atlanta University Center and the University Community Development Corporation, Annie E. Casey Foundation, Tapestry Development and other mixed income developers, the West End Business Association, and other community based entities to catalyze incremental reinvestment at a pace that stretches out and thus eases the impacts of gentrification and displacement over time;
  • Partner to improve existing parks, like the BeltLine’s current effort at Arthur Langford Park, Oakland City Park and James Orange Recreation Center, interim park use at underutilized MARTA stations, and other existing but resource-poor park sites, as well as trails like PATH’s west side/ Vine City promenade;
  • Partner with the Atlanta Board of Education to improve the settings of existing schools, in particular to assure safe sidewalk access to all in or near the TAD areas.

How can the BeltLine pay for all of this?

The principal source of support for acting on community-identified needs and priorities would come from diverting attention away from the BeltLine’s transit aspirations, for the time being. Use the Atlanta Streetcar as a test case, and give it a year to prove its merit or correct its flaws. Then revisit the transit part of the BeltLine program. Putting all transit-related funding on the backburner, including dropping transit “readiness” from future trail design and development, could redirect the some $200 million presently carried over the next four years in the BeltLine Strategic Implementation Plan budget.

At this point, there is no evidence that the current transit concepts and the development projections on which they are based are realistic or fundable. The issues raised in the Atlanta Development Authority’s transit “white paper,” prepared 10 years ago, are just as daunting and unresolved now as they were then:

  • Insufficient ridership to justify rail transit;
  • Lack of foreseeable funding sources for both capital and operating costs (including inconceivable reliance on federal funding);
  • Overblown population and job projections;
  • Seemingly insurmountable technical and cost challenges to overcome the gaps in the loop’s continuity.

Yet at great cost the BeltLine continues to plan for and build its trails to be able to eventually accommodate streetcars. A case in point is the three mile Westside Trail, whose $40 million cost is three-quarters due to streetcar “readiness,” which is at best a chancy proposition. Better to have built it as a safe, well-lit forest trail sooner at a quarter of the cost and to have saved the hundreds of mature trees now being toppled along its “streetcar-ready” path. Yet the amount of the expenditure is trumpeted as a win for “equitable” development.

The opportunity is now to use the BeltLine’s resources to reduce the wealth gap and to hold out hope for low wealth citizens along its path. Coupled with the persistent infeasibility of the transit concept, let’s call for taking a breather on the transit part and redirecting energy and resources to where they’re most needed.

 

4 replies
  1. rossdes says:

    I appreciate Mr. Dobbins comments, but the beltline is already proving to be a valuable and positive asset to the areas it touches. Not withstanding the larger societal issues, it is a transit plan. The development of the Old Forth Ward has been greatly accelerated due to its presence. Go out at 6:00 in the morning and people are using it for exercise or commuting to work. It is an amazing connector. Put the rail piece in place and it will provide the parallel system Atlanta’s public transportation is sorely lacking. Creating a viable alternate to an ever more clogged roadway system is the ultimate goal of this transportation network. 

    A transportation system cannot be developed in unbroken segments. Putting the infrastructure in place for future light rail is in fact one of the most cost effective aspects of the plan to date. It would be unfair and inappropriate to tie the future of rail along the beltline to the success or failure of a street trolley whose existence wasn’t even on the map during the initial planning phases of the project.

    Once the pieces are in place, then the TAD money can radiate out to correct other issues. At the moment it has already added a tremendous amount of greenspace to the city in terms of park redevelopment. A lot of money was poured into the areas he cites during the rush for the 1996 Olympics with very little longterm benefit to those areas or their residents. Instead of continuing that approach. Going back further. The politicization of Marta along racial lines directly tie to the issues of ridership and public relations that dog it until today.

    Lets take a rational approach to planning and get the project finished before we start to judge.Report

    Reply
  2. Latyrx says:

    rossdes Have to agree with the article that the Beltline has fallen short on revitalizing struggling areas.  I would not use O4W as an example of progress, on the contrary it has created expensive housing and few working class jobs.

    “Go out at 6:00 in the morning and people are using it for exercise or commuting to work”.  That remains one of the big issues on the East side, the trail is not developing into a transit path but more of an exercise and tourist path.  The jury is still out on the street car until it can prove that it is useful to commuters and ridership can sustain it.  I still fail to see how a light rail will be cost effective to build over many difficult and challenging environments not to mention the close proximity to high end housing.Report

    Reply
  3. health_impact says:

    As always, Dobbins brilliantly captures the human needs and possibilities of the BeltLine, up until he talks about transit.

    It’s an urgent time to be thinking about equity along the BeltLine. Redevelopment along the Eastside Trail has demonstrated the impact of the project and also beefed up the amount of TAD dollars they have to work with going in to the south and west parts of the corridor. Some of the maps I’ve seen show the BeltLine east side ZIP codes being one of the few areas of strong property value growth in the region. However, there is a major risk for other parts of the corridor that could transition from being too affordable now – underinvested – to unaffordable in a few short years. The BeltLine organizations and the community organizations will all have to be on their A game to create and preserve more affordable homes than are lost.

    And as Dobbins points out, economic development has been lacking. Job training, which should have been coordinated with AWDA, hasn’t happened as that city agency has imploded. And direct economic development incentives have not been on the table yet, but should be soon as the new parks and trails come on line in underinvested areas.

    However, the BeltLine needs transit, and soon. The amount of density created by redevelopment, which is pretty decent, can’t be served without robust alternatives to driving. What’s more, the BeltLine runs directly through some of the areas of west Atlanta with the longest commutes (mostly transit commutes) in the region. One of the most powerful equity tools the BeltLine can wield is to provide these chronically underserved communities with a direct transit line to the explosion of small businesses, retail and service jobs, and even global headquarters that are locating along the eastern portion of the BeltLine. The lack of convenient and affordable transportation to jobs was pointed out by the Brookings Institution as being one of the major factors that prevents economic mobility in Atlanta, and the BeltLine should be part of the cure.Report

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

What are your thoughts?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.