Transportation report omits P3 option despite its use on I-75, Ga. 400

By David Pendered

The Georgia Legislature’s committee report on transportation funding does not appear to acknowledge the one financing method being employed to ease two major bottlenecks in metro Atlanta.

Columns, Northwest Corridor

Columns are being installed at this site, looking north from the Canton Road Connector Loop, along the public private Northwest Corridor project. Credit: GDOT

The words, “public private partnership,” seem to appear nowhere in 12 potential solutions named in the report. It’s as if the P3 approach that’s successfully underway in the Northwest Corridor, and planned for the I-285/Ga. 400 area, didn’t warrant mention in the final report.

That said, P3 is still at the top-of-mind at the Georgia Department of Transportation for reasons including:

  • The Jan. 15 deadline for companies to submit their statements of interest on the 285/400 project;
  • Progress on the Northwest Corridor project, along I-75 and I-575. The project is to open by mid 2018, well ahead of schedule according to historic norms because of the way the deal was structured, GDOT officials have said.

There’s no doubt the report is due for plenty of debate in the legislative session that begins Jan. 12. And there’s little doubt the omission of P3 will be well vetted. The report was formally released Dec. 30, just in time to land in the doldrums of the holiday season’s end.

In a conversation Monday, Russell McMurry delivered positive reports about both of the current P3 projects in metro Atlanta. McMurry is a longtime GDOT official who served most recently as the state’s chief transportation engineer. Gov. Nathan Deal tapped McMurry, in November, to succeed Toby Carr as the state’s transportation planning director.

Columns, Northwest Corridor North of I-285

Construction crews have prepared to form columns for a concrete pour on the north side of I-285. Credit: GDOT

For the 285/400 project, McMurry said the private sector is slated to provide construction financing to the tune of $600 million or so, depending on the final bid.

“It’s basically a construction loan the state will pay back over 10 years,” McMurry said. “We’re able to accelerate the project by the private equity coming to the table. The state of Georgia will pay it back with state and federal dollars.”

Without that cash infusion, the project probably would languish for years – until the state was able to cobble together money from its more traditional sources:

  • In the form of cash, to start work, and;
  • Adequate revenue projections from any number of sources – anticipated state and federal revenues, potential tolls – to satisfy potential investors who would buy bonds the state would sell to finance construction.

Regarding the Northwest Corridor project, McMurry said the private sector is providing more than $60 million to cover construction costs. The state is to repay the private partners with funds from state and federal sources, McMurry said – including low-cost credit assistance from the federal government.

A public private partnership is to retool the I-285/Ga. 400 area in order to ease traffic congestion. File/Credit: David Pendered

A public private partnership is to retool the I-285/Ga. 400 area in order to ease traffic congestion. File/Credit: David Pendered

McMurry said Georgia is financing the project with about $274 million provided through a federal TIFIA loan. The hybrid of funding that Georgia proposed to repay the loan was a key reason Georgia won funding approval through the 1998 Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act.

“They liked it because it was a safe way to invest money,” McMurry said.

The first of two payments is scheduled when the road is substantially complete, defined as ready to be driven. The second payment is due when the road is open for use and as contractors are completing the final details, McMurry said.

The governor has not said in public how he thinks Georgia should address transportation funding. Late last year, Deal said he did not want to get in front of the report from the Joint Study Committee on Critical Transportation Infracstructure Funding.

The state House and Senate agreed to create the committee when they adopted House Resolution 1573 during the 2014 session. The governor signed the resolution on April 22, 2014.

David Pendered, Managing Editor, is an Atlanta journalist with more than 30 years experience reporting on the region’s urban affairs, from Atlanta City Hall to the state Capitol. Since 2008, he has written for print and digital publications, and advised on media and governmental affairs. Previously, he spent more than 26 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and won awards for his coverage of schools and urban development. David graduated from North Carolina State University and was a Western Knight Center Fellow. David was born in Pennsylvania, grew up in North Carolina and is married to a fifth-generation Atlantan.

2 replies
  1. gt7348b says:

    David – Russell provided you with the reason P3 was not mentioned in the funding report by the Study Committee: P3s are a financing mechanism, not a funding source. P3s are a project delivery method not a funding stream and therefore including them in a report on funding would have been inappropriate.Report

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

What are your thoughts?