Government and business leaders agree: Do what people like

Trustee Howard J. Lallie October 21, 2011

Howard Lalli of HL Strategy

Most discussions of sustainability begin with people offering their definitions of sustainability. Unlike other topics – think democracy in the political realm or safety in a corporate environment – framing sustainability isn’t just a matter of degrees of difference in views. It can be a real clash of values.

In such a dynamic marketplace of ideas, it can be challenging for an enterprise to ground itself strategically. Do you start with a set of values and principles? Do you begin with standards set by third parties? What about the voice of your customers or constituents? Other stakeholders? Best practices among your peer group?

The questions are particularly relevant coming out of the Great Recession, with companies, organizations and governments having rationalized resources now adjusting to new market realities. So it was with great interest that I had the opportunity recently to participate in a gathering of thought leaders in New York to consider sustainable cities – with a particular focus on energy.

Across a number of discussions, it was striking to me how often government and business leaders alike echoed a common refrain when considering how to make sustainability work: People have to like it. Whether you’re an elected official who ultimately needs the approval of voters or a company leader who needs the endorsement of customers, the market must embrace something for it to be not only environmentally and socially sustainable – but economically sustainable, too.

Enrique Penalosa, mayor of Bogota, Colombia from 1998 to 2001, for example, described leading the development of a citywide bus rapid transit system and an extensive network of bikeways. More than a decade later, millions of transit riders and thousands of cyclists traverse that city in new ways.

The greatest recent public example of such a public embrace in Atlanta is the Atlanta BeltLine’s Eastside Trail. The combination of trail and linear greenspace stretches from Piedmont Park to Inman Park past the new Historic Fourth Ward Park. On any given day – peaking on weekends – it is filled with walkers, joggers, runners, bikers and more. The market is responding in other ways, too: developers are redeveloping along the corridor, business and tenants are committing to the location, and people are buying goods and services, too.

While everyone’s definition of sustainability is a little different, few will take issue with the economic, environmental and social benefits of the environmental remediation of a historic rail corridor that gives people new (less auto-dependent) ways to traverse the city – on bike and foot today and on transit tomorrow – and creates opportunity in Atlanta’s neighborhoods.

Most importantly – and most gratifying to the many, many of us who have each done our small part to contribute to its success – is the Eastside Trail’s popularity. It is a very tangible answer to at least part of the equation in making sustainability happen: Do things that people like.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The National Brownfields Conference comes to Atlanta

Trustee Howard J. Lallie October 21, 2011

Howard J. Lalli

By Howard Lalli

From May 15-17, Atlanta will highlight an aspect of its national sustainability leadership when it hosts the largest event in the country that focuses on environmental revitalization and economic redevelopment: The National Brownfields Conference.

From Atlantic Station  to Aerotropolis Atlanta and the Atlanta BeltLine, Atlanta has an impressive track record of large-scale, re-use and redevelopment of properties that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines as brownfields because of the presence of pollutants or contaminants. EPA  and Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division both have brownfields programs making it practical to safely clean up and sustainably reuse these properties. The Georgia Brownfield Association works to ensure our state can build on its record of redevelopment.

Redeveloping a brownfield promises significant economic, environmental and social return on investment for public and private partners alike. The life expectancy of industrial and commercial properties is limited. Their location and infrastructure – typically served by transportation, water, power and other resources – make them ideal for new uses. This recycling of land and mitigation of environmental impacts has the added benefit of saving greenspace from being developed elsewhere for commercial or industrial use. And the return of these often stigmatized, underutilized or abandoned properties to productive use can mean new jobs and revenue for public services.

Brownfield redevelopment is typically complex, usually requiring significant legal and technical expertise. Property owners, real estate redevelopers, financiers, regulators and the community all require patience, persistence and tolerance for risk in pursuing brownfield redevelopment. But choosing not to reclaim these properties represents even greater economic, environmental and social risk. And state and federal brownfield programs as well as legal and technical know-how have evolved significantly over the past decade. So brownfield redevelopment today offers significant opportunity for all of those stakeholders.

With thousands of government leaders, real estate developers and investors, economic and community development officials, attorneys and academics, and construction and engineering professionals descending on Atlanta for the National Brownfields Conference, the Southeast has a once-in-a-decade opportunity to share what we’ve accomplished and to learn from others.

Howard Lalli leads HL Strategy, a communications consultancy focused on economic, environmental and social sustainability.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment