Type to search

Maria's Metro

GeorgiaForward making strides to unify the state with a common vision

By Maria Saporta

Consider all the many ways Georgia can be carved up.

We have 159 counties and as many as 500 cities and towns.

We have got metro Atlanta, 13 other significant metro areas and the rural parts of the state.

We have the two Georgias — metro Atlanta and the rest of the state.

We have 12 metro planning districts (think TSPLOST).

But it takes a special skill to figure how we can be one Georgia.

That was just what Georgia Forward, an organization of civic, government, business, academic and non-profit leaders, tried to visualize at its third annual conference this week in Athens, Ga.

Amir Farokhi, executive director of GeorgiaForward, with keynote speaker, Col. Mark Mykleby, a New America Foundation fellow (Photos by Maria Saporta)

Here is the thesis. As long as we are a divided state with multiple and contradictory visions for Georgia we will never reach our potential.

So how can Georgia build consensus towards a cohesive and inspirational vision for our state? Georgia Forward added another twist this year. How can Georgia in 20 years become a national model for prosperity in every corner of the state?

GeorgiaForward made a valiant attempt to answer those questions over two days of meetings where several issues critical to our prosperity were explored — health, transportation, rural development, thriving cities as well as hunger and poverty.

About 240 leaders attended the two-day forum from Sept. 12 to 13 — sharing their thoughts of how Georgia can become a more unified state.

Facilitator Otis White of Civic Strategies gives instructions to GeorgiaForward attendees during working session

At the end of the conference, attendees were asked what should be the state’s priorities.

Of 16 different choices, participants settled on six issues that should take priority. In descending order, they were:

1. Create new transportation connections in Georgia, esp. between regional hubs — including highways and rail networks;

2. 2. Find ways of connecting all parts of Georgia to broadband through incentives to until the gap is closed for all Georgians;

3. Create a statewide “quality communities” initiative based on a quality of life vision by creating partnerships with government, businesses and nonprofits;

GeorgiaForward attendees brainstorm during working session

4. Create a strategy and set of programs for retaining our graduates through tax credits, incentives and a welcoming culture;

5. Create a “collaboration pyramid” in Georgia where grassroots conversations between business, community and local government leaders drive the vision among the different regions throughout Georgia and at the state level; and

6. Create a statewide Pre-school to college education initiative by providing access to high-quality early education and creating a higher education curriculum that is aligned with business needs.

The group also worked on a “vision statement” for the whole state (see draft document below with additional notes based on breakout discussions).

Given the time and energy leaders were willing to spend at the GeorgiaForward forum, it is clear there is a hunger to build bridges between various parts of the state for the greater good.

Inevitably, the forum invites comparisons to North Carolina, which has had a similar statewide envisioning process for decades. Not coincidentally, today North Carolina is enjoying the enviable reputation as being perhaps the most successful state in the Southeast if not the nation — a position Georgia used to enjoy.

GeorgiaForward attendees agree on need to connect the state with transportation networks

GeorgiaForward emerged out of a concern that because of a fractured relationship between different parts of the state, Georgia’s economic vitality was slipping backwards as other competing states were stepping into the spotlight.

“The idea of GeorgiaForward came out of a series of meetings five years ago,” said A.J. Robinson, chair of the GeorgiaForward board who also is president of Central Atlanta Progress. “Everybody felt we could do a better job in our state building a common vision for all.”

Although there has been widespread grassroots support for GeorgiaForward, it has not yet attracted the kind of financial support it needs to continue its valuable work.

“We are making slow and steady progress,” Robinson said. “The quality of this forum and the quality of the dialogue is the best yet.”

Later Robinson added: “We could do so much more with a little more resources and a little more help.”

For now, GeorgiaForward is basically a one man operation — Amir Farokhi, the organization’s executive director. In addition to the annual forum, GeorgiaForward is working on several other initiatives throughout the year.

It would seem that all sorts of people, companies, philanthropies and institutions should be supporting an effort that could be key to our state’s economic future and our ability to meld the great divide between all the various Georgias that have held us back.

Certainly it’s worth all of us doing what we can to propel GeorgiaForward.

A Vision for Statewide Prosperity

Original draft: 9/12/2012

In 2032, Georgia is the only state that has found a way to create prosperity that is “deep and wide” – that is anchored in industries and jobs that will grow in the future and is spread across the state.

At the core of this transformation are some changes that have come to the state:

Collaboration: Georgia has developed unparalleled cooperation, among local governments, regional planning agencies, economic development organizations, universities and within state government. Leaders across Georgia know how the other regions are doing and are committed to helping one another prosper.

Connectivity: Georgia has become the most interconnected state in the country in terms of travel and communication. It is easy to get from one part of the state to the other, by road, air and rail. And Georgia has become a leader in Internet access. As a result, statewide meetings are held on the Internet routinely, which reinforces the collaboration that the state has become known for.

A shared vision with many parts: Because of the state’s connectivity and collaboration, Georgia’s leaders have found it easier and easier to agree on important economic development strategies. That doesn’t mean that every part of Georgia produces the same things, but rather that their economies are increasingly complementary. When the state starts an economic development initiative, the 14 metro areas and the smaller communities quickly find parts of the strategy that they do best.

In addition to these changes, Georgia has made breakthroughs in two areas important to a quality work force:

· It has solved the health care access problem. Every part of the state has quality health care and increasingly healthy lifestyles, thanks to better education and nutrition.

· It has solved the education access problem. Metro Atlanta has long been a center of higher education excellence. Now Georgia has found way of making those assets available to citizens across the state, along with dramatic improvements to K-12 and technical education.

Finally, there has been an awakening in Georgia’s communities. They have accepted the need for a high quality of life as the best way of keeping talented young people. From access to arts and recreation to a growing appreciation of local history and institutions, communities are finding ways of making themselves more distinctive and appealing.

Because it has done these things, per capita income is rising fast in Georgia, it has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country, its education and health care outcomes are improving rapidly, and every part of the state shares in the prosperity.

Suggested changes 9/13/2012

Notes: In their editing of the vision draft, the small groups made many suggestions for word changes and reorganization. For instance, they suggested changing the verb tenses in various places, tightening the language, and moving paragraphs from one section to another.

There were also suggestions for names of issues and opportunities. One group was cautious, for instance, about the term “shared vision” because its members felt it was too “utopian;” they suggested using the word “consensus” instead. Another group felt that dividing education between K-12 and higher education missed an opportunity to see education as a larger system. It suggested calling it “P-21,” which would include education from pre-school through college.

There were also new ideas that might be worth considering as future revisions are made. They include:

· In addition to overcoming the health care access and education access problems, Georgia should become a leader in overcoming diversity issues.

· Another major obstacle to be considered in statewide prosperity efforts is water.

· The word “sustainability” or “sustainable” should be part of any vision for statewide prosperity.

· The paragraph about quality of life should include a clearer statement of the importance of arts and culture.

Maria Saporta

Maria Saporta, Editor, is a longtime Atlanta business, civic and urban affairs journalist with a deep knowledge of our city, our region and state.  Since 2008, she has written a weekly column and news stories for the Atlanta Business Chronicle. Prior to that, she spent 27 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, becoming its business columnist in 1991. Maria received her Master’s degree in urban studies from Georgia State and her Bachelor’s degree in journalism from Boston University. Maria was born in Atlanta to European parents and has two young adult children.



  1. Burroughston Broch September 17, 2012 12:20 pm

    Maria, this group seems to be yet another repackaging of the same City of Atlanta players who would like to influence the State. They don’t tell us their officers, staff, board and supporters on their website (not a sign of transparency!) but one can guess from the sponsors of their 2012 Forum: Central Atlanta Progress, Atlanta Downtown Improvement District, King & Spalding, Piedmont Healthcare, and the Metro Atlanta Chamber. The usual list of suspects.
    This group could not unify Metro Atlanta, much less the State. They should act small and build a track record before they think big.Report

    1. Amir Farokhi September 18, 2012 1:22 pm

       @Burroughston Broch GeorgiaForward is not in any way an advocate for any region of the state or any legislative action.  Rather, we are a platform for cross-region, cross disciplinary problem-solving and visioning.  We invite people from across the state to the table to promote statewide policy problem-solving. Contrary to your assertion, the website lists the Board of Directors http://georgiaforward.org/who-we-are/leadership/ and staff http://georgiaforward.org/who-we-are/executive-director/  Our funding comes from corporate sponsors and foundations, from Macon to Columbus to Atlanta to West Point.  Participants in our work come from every part of Georgia and political spectrum.  You can see many of them in this video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGWYstnYkw0&feature=youtu.be 
      Part of our challenge as a state is the absence of statewide collaboration and a statewide vision for where we are headed.  Other states with which we used to be compared, are flourishing as a result of acting with a statewide mindset and framework.   We seek to be stimulate smarter, more visionary policy approaches for Georgia that are grounded in what is best for the state.  We hope that you will join us!Report

      1. Burroughston Broch September 18, 2012 3:39 pm

        Amir, thanks for providing the links for the Board and staff.  However, they are not apparent on the website home page, and it does not indicate a site map. Rest assured, I looked around it for a while before I posted. How is one to guess that the links exist?
        I am glad to see that you have Board members outside Metro Atlanta. Nevertheless, GeorgiaForward is dominated by Central Atlanta Progress, as a review of the Secretary of State’s website will confirm.
        I suggest that GeorgiaForward focus first on the Metro region before attempting to corral the entire state. TSPLOST would have been a good example, had it succeeded.

  2. tcGSgis September 17, 2012 2:43 pm

    RT @MetroCOLA: @GeorgiaForward making strides to unify the state with a common vision http://t.co/31iyBKnU ~ @SaportaReportReport

  3. virginia982 September 21, 2012 10:04 pm

    this is a great article. thank you for posting!

  4. sokittome12 October 20, 2012 1:42 pm

    Sorry, but as a site selector with over 20 years in the business, Georgia has never enjoyed the kind of reputation and success that North Carolina had and has.  To suggest that is just patently wrong and rings of pandering.  As an Atlanta resident for the past 20 years, relocating her just prior to the Olympics from NC, I have been continuously disappointed in the State Government’s ability to provide any leadership at all in larger questions of development, including the ones outlined below.  I can tell you that among site selectors, Atlanta for a time was completely off the map due to quality public education (lacking) and transportation (lacking).  When given a choice no company will chose to site facilities in Georgia when other options are on an equal footing.  Here are a few practical recommendations to move Georgia Forward:
    First assumption that “rest of GA” must accept.  Atlanta is 80% of Gross State Product.  As Atlanta goes so will the rest of Georgia.  As long as the “rest of GA” works against Atlanta’s interests, we will continue to fall behind.  This means “rest of GA” will fall behind even further.  
    Second assumption:   Atlanta should strive to become a global city of the future, combining the best practices of development, transportation, the environment and livability.   
    1 – Consolidate the number of counties in the state to a more manageable number.   There are too many votes in the state “legislature” who need to work regionally on initiatives of regional importance. 
    2-  Start fresh with MARTA and include a plan for regional rail, connecting Atlanta to Macon, Savannah, Athens and the other second tier communities.  When gas reaches $8.00 a gallon, you will be surprised at how this would propel development across the state.  
    3 – Begin a series of several hundred million bond issues for quality of life.  Note examples in Oklahoma City and Denver.  Some economic development groups have figured out that if you can build parks, you will attract the high tech workforce of the future.  The next generation behind us has a preference for quality of life and public transportation, believe it or not.Report

    1. Burroughston Broch October 20, 2012 4:23 pm

      When you write Atlanta, do you mean the City of Atlanta or the Metro Atlanta region?Report

      1. sokittome12 October 20, 2012 5:45 pm

        @Burroughston Broch
        I don’t think anyone believes that Atlanta is the unfortunate geo-political boundaries on The City of Atlanta.Report

        1. Burroughston Broch October 20, 2012 10:49 pm

          @sokittome12  I then assume that when you write Atlanta you mean metro Atlanta. Correct?Report

  5. sokittome12 October 25, 2012 9:28 am

    I am struck by the fact that there is glowing admiration for Georgia throughout the first half of this dissertation as in ,”
    Georgia has developed unparalleled cooperation, among local governments, regional planning agencies, economic development organizations, universities and within state government….,” suggesting that they were all present in the room when this was drafted.  
    This statement is neither true, testable, or based on any specific example or fact.  As such it is pandering and should be removed.  
    If everything is so great, why the urgent need for change?  
    My other major point is that all of the major initiatives you cite are all in place in Georgia in some way shape or form, showing that this group has neither studied the problem or taken the time to ask anyone in any detail about the issues.  
    Lastly, any sort of recommendation that you make must only be put forward after vetting on:  1-does this have a realistic chance of success? 2 – Is this immediately actionable? 3- Does this stand to benefit everyone w/o making anyone worse off? 4-Does this require $ such that it is not realistic?
    If you are serious, put together $350,000 and hire a good strategy firm.  It is money well spent.   Having been part of hundreds of economic development plans, you are on the wrong path with this.   Maybe just a political exercise?Report

    1. Burroughston Broch October 25, 2012 5:37 pm

      @sokittome12 Of course, it is primarily a political exercise. It may also be part of the Saporta Group’s new “thought leadership” business model, similar to MARTA.Report


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.