The BeltLine scoots

Image via Unsplash.
By Guest Columnist JUDY DIGGS KEENAN
First let me make my position clear—I love the BeltLine. Almost daily, I am on it running, walking to the grocery, or taking my dogs to Piedmont Park. The creation of real walkability for in-town Atlanta has truly revitalized this city. Nevertheless, some basic issues need to be addressed. For starters, let’s talk e-vehicles — from scooters to bikes to those strange one-wheeled things that look like they came out of a “Back to the Future” movie. It reminds me of that South Park Episode “The Scoots,” (Season 22, episode 5). One day scooters appear and suddenly they have taken over the BeltLine. Trying to sidle onto the path on a sunny weekend day is more dangerous than merging onto the connector on a Friday afternoon.

Judy Diggs Keenan has worked as an editor and writer. Currently, she has a wholesale needlepoint design business, Canvas & Thread and is working toward a certificate in creative writing.
According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, injuries from these micro-mobility vehicles jumped 70 percent during the four years from 2017 to 2021 across the country. What’s more, many studies worldwide have shown that, e-scooters in particular, are substantially more dangerous than bicycles or motorcycles.
The City of Atlanta adopted an ordinance in January 2019 regulating their use, including such basic safety measures as no cell phone use while riding, one person per scooter, and always yielding to pedestrians. Furthermore, children 16 and younger are required to wear a helmet. These laws are routinely ignored on the BeltLine.
My personal pet peeve is when people line up their scooters or simply drop them in the running lane. According to the city ordinance, scooters should always be left upright and not block the right of way. Furthermore, any non-functioning scooter should be immediately removed from service or the rental company can be fined up to $1,000 per day. The ordinances are there, but not the enforcement.
The Atlanta BeltLine, Inc., which is responsible for the building of the BeltLine, has started an etiquette campaign, which from my observation, has consisted of a series of signs along the right of way that try to educate users on basic manners and safety. It will take more than a few friendly signs to help people be aware of other people around them. How likely is someone who doesn’t notice that their dog is clotheslining the entire width of the BeltLine, likely to notice a sign? The problem with basic etiquette has more to do with an entitlement mentality that is buried much deeper in our culture, unfortunately.
Once the Atlanta BeltLine Inc. builds a section, they then turn it over to the City of Atlanta. In 2013 The City of Atlanta partnered with the Atlanta BeltLine Inc. to create the Path Force unit, which is an arm of the Atlanta Police Department. I remember years ago seeing pairs of bicycle cops cruising up and down. I can honestly state that I have not seen one Path Force officer on the BeltLine in quite a few years.
It started out in 2013 as a 15-person unit. A 2017 United States Department of Justice Grant was supposed to double the Path Force, by adding an additional 15 officers. But the City of Atlanta website indicates it is still a 15-officer unit. My repeated phone calls to the APD have not been returned. To their credit, they have added lighting and security cameras along the 33 miles of BeltLine, but cameras have no ability to enforce laws.
In a recent off-the-record conversation I struck up with an off-duty police officer on the topic, he told me that they put the rookie cops on the Path Force and that they receive little training and fewer benefits, so the turnover is quite high.
According to Aaron Gordon in an article published in Vice, America doesn’t have the infrastructure for e-bikes, which are faster and heavier than regular bikes. I would add that we don’t have the infrastructure for most e-vehicles, especially on the BeltLine, where travelers, be they on foot, bike, or e-vehicle, move at varying speeds and often stop unpredictably. Recently, as I walked home with a backpack full of groceries from the BeltLine Kroger — formerly known as Murder Kroger — I saw a fallen scooter and a pool of blood where the passage narrows for the bridge across Ponce.
Obviously we need to enforce the few laws that we do have. Everyone knows the Atlanta Police Department is underfunded and oftentimes dealing with crimes much more significant than people riding scooters in tandem. If the APD doesn’t have the means to monitor and enforce safe practices on the BeltLine, then perhaps the BeltLine organization needs to put some of their funds and efforts into hiring private off-duty officers to patrol.
…
Would you like to write a guest column for SaportaReport? The SR team strives to uplift and amplify the diverse perspectives in our community, and we want to hear from you! Email Editor Derek Prall to discuss the specifics.
This is a well-known problem, and it has a well-known solution. Unfortunately, Atlanta Beltline Inc. is adamant that they will not provide the solution.
The solultion is “modal separation” — separate tracks for the different modes of walking and biking. The Beltline needs a second track for bicycles/scooters. That would separate the pedestrians enjoying a linear park from the bikers racing from point A to point B.
The terms for those wheeled travelers is “LIT”, which stands for light, individualized transportation. The Beltline needs to accommodate LIT.
The PATH Foundation (perhaps the single most competent and impactful organization for Atlanta’s urban development) designs at least some of its trails with modal separation. You can see photos of PATH Foundation’s LIT lanes/modal separation at http://www.SaveTheBeltline.netReport
Connectivity and decency is key. The PATH foundation often have their hands tied. They work with individual communities, and they do not emphasize connectivity of their trails, so many people do not use them, except to maybe to walk their dog or take a run. Compare the minimal use of the City of Decatur PATH vs the vibrancy and life of the Beltline.
Walkers, bikers, and scooter people actually have to be somewhat decent to pedestrians on a shared path like the Beltline. When you create LIT lanes, they will be used for speeding past walkers. Bicyclists and scooter people will be even more likely to hit 20-30 mph if they have they own lane.Report
Connectivity and decency is key. The PATH foundation often have their hands tied. They work with individual communities, and they do not emphasize connectivity of their trails, so many people do not use them, except to maybe walk their dog or take a run. Compare the minimal use of the City of Decatur PATH vs the vibrancy and life of the Beltline.
Walkers, bikers, and scooter people actually have to be somewhat decent to pedestrians on a shared path like the Beltline. When you create LIT lanes, they will be used for speeding past walkers. Bicyclists and scooter people will be even more likely to hit 20-30 mph if they have they own lane.Report
Wouldn’t it be nice if the vendors had in place the means by which to enforce their own user agreements and to keep their users in line with the City of Atlanta permit requirements?
In the flawed business model of the micromobility vendors, the City is left with the expense of enforcement which is not achievable in these troubling times of post-pandemic, staffing challenges and a hierarchy of law enforcement priorities.
I want transit alternatives.
I really do not want public money and resources to be spent to support this business model that has a negative impact on quality of life in the downtown tourist/business/residential district.Report
I am all for using the Beltline for both recreation and as a means of reducing traffic on our streets. While scooters are often a challenge, cyclists and electric one-shell skateboard users often use the pathway like a track for race qualifying. On days when the weather is nice I avoid walking there simply because I don’t want to be involved in a crash due to someone else’s recklessness.
I appreciate Jennifer Brooks points, and the city does require scooter companies to have permits. However, the city doesn’t charge car and truck manufacturers when someone driving their vehicles causes a crash on city streets. Likewise, would we fine bicycle and skateboard manufacturers for injuries caused by their customers?
The city has invested considerably in the Beltline. We need to adequately fund, train, and staff public safety personnel so that it can be enjoyed by everyone, while lowering the risk of injury.by enforcing safe use.Report
The Beltline is far more adapted to scooters than bikes, at least the road bikes I’ve ridden most of my life. They keep the weight back on the balls of the feet. When you ride a road bike your weight is pushed over the handlebars, making quick cuts difficult. You’re also going faster, up to 10 mph, while scooters generally go at half that speed.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that the Beltline is not a bike path. These are the earliest days of our all-electric future.Report
1) Am l correct that the Beltline, at least originally, prohibited access by motorized vehicles?
2) Don’t electric scooters and bikes have a motor?
3) If one and 2 are correct why are scooters and electric bikes allowed to, on some days literally take over the BeltlineReport
Begs the question of what is going to happen to Beltline foot/bike/scooter traffic when the new developments at Krog Street and Ralph McGill, as well as the new hotel at PCM go online?
Here’s a summary of the Ralph McGill project: The first phase of the development includes a 480,000 square foot office building with street and BeltLine-facing retail, along with a hotel/social club. These three buildings will be constructed over a 1,250-space subterranean parking deck that will be shared by all uses. Future phases of the project will include approximately 1.2 million square feet of additional density.Report
The beltline isn’t the only place this happens. It’s all over the city. Blocking sidewalks, curb cuts, entrances. Why make a law you won’t enforce? If the city won’t enforce the law they could be taken to court. It’s time.Report
I no longer use the beltline, nor do I hope to. Sadly, I once thought this project was going to have actual usable transit. I was naive. I will be dead before Atlanta gets truly functional transit, possibly hit by someone desperate to turn left on a blinking yellow light after having sat through three cycles of a protected turn light allowing exactly one car through the intersection each cycle.Report