Capitol Views by Kelly Jordan
Capitol Views by Kelly Jordan

Back in 2017, Georgia promised to cut probation time for folks who behave. But the process isn’t working for most people who are on the straight-and-narrow. A bipartisan group of state lawmakers are reworking the law.

“Think about the 40-something thousand people in our state that should no longer be on probation by our current law, yet are still answering to probation officers, still have to tell a landlord, have to tell a boss, that they’re on probation,” said state Sen. Brian Strickland, R-McDonough, sponsor of Senate Bill 105.

Another number he mentioned: $34 million. That’s how much he said it costs Georgia each year to supervise people who don’t need supervision.

Strickland’s bipartisan bill clarifies what’s in the law already: certain first-time nonviolent felons who act good can get off probation early. It’s called a getting a “behavioral incentive date.”

“Acting good” means things like paying restitution, not having a probation revocation, and not getting arrested.

But only 213 well-behaved people were able to get off probation early during the first three years the law was in effect, according to the Georgia Department of Community Supervision.

“One of the big things we’ve seen is a lot of our courts are not putting these [behavioral incentive] dates in sentences when they should,” Strickland told a state House panel Wednesday.

His bill clears up a lot of things things that weren’t specific the first time around, like that a probationer needs to go without a revocation for 24 months to qualify for early termination. And that relevant court orders must automatically include a behavioral incentive date.

Right now, the processes probably get handled a little bit differently in every court circuit. The bill makes things a little more uniform.

Strickland attributed the bill to the Georgia Justice Project and the Faith and Freedom Coalition.

Lisa McGahan, policy director at the Georgia Justice Project praised the bill, calling it clear and uniform.

“And it eliminates the confusion between the existing pathways and that’s really important,” she said. “That’s why I think we’ve had so many hurdles with getting early termination in the past.”

Adam Pipkin, executive director of the Faith and Freedom Coalition of Georgia, said people who have done all they’ve been asked to do should be able to be at home and be good mothers and fathers and productive members of society.

Strickland also said the bill builds on the work of former Gov. Nathan Deal, whose marquee policy was limiting the growth of Georgia’s imprisoned population, and getting Georgia out of the top national ranks for residents in prison or under supervision.

Or as Deal used to put it, that Georgia should save expensive prison beds for people we’re scared of, not people we’re mad at.

Sam Olens, a Republican former attorney general of Georgia, turned up to testify in favor of Strickland’s bill.

“The prior bill from 2017 was nice in theory, but it hasn’t worked in practice,” Olens said.

Woodbine Republican state Rep. Steve Sainz called the 2021 version a good bill.

“The more people we put out of community supervision that don’t need it, the more time our Department of Community Supervision officers have to monitor sex offenders and doing things that are of public interest,” Sainz said.

The bill could come up for a Georgia House subcommittee vote as early as next week.

The full state Senate already approved the bill unanimously.  It’s got to get through both chambers by March 31 to get sent to Gov. Brian Kemp’s desk for his review this spring.


Georgia Department of Community Supervision’s 3-year review of behavioral incentive dates

Maggie Lee is a freelance reporter who's been covering Georgia and metro Atlanta government and politics since 2008.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Even though it is good to see such a much-needed bill going through the Georgia legislature, it was disheartening to read Rep. Sainz state that the more people we put out of community supervision that don’t need it, the more time our Department of Community Supervision officers have to monitor sex offenders.

    According to Karl Hanson, one of the leading researchers in the field of sex offender risk assessment and treatment, in the recent webinar conducted by One Standard of Justice in Connecticut, numerous studies on the re-offense rate (committing another sex offense) for people on the sex offense registry have shown a lifetime re-offense rate anywhere from 10% to 30%, with the larger studies showing the lower rates. (

    When looking at the different subgroups within the sex offense registry, some subgroups have a lifetime re-offense rate less than 5%.

    A great deal of money is spent in this country to monitor hundreds of thousands of registrants who have one-time-only sex offenses and are leading lives now as law-abiding citizens. Check out the video produced by the California Sex Offender Management Board (CASOMB) at

    There are some truly dangerous people on the registry who need to be monitored, but the majority do not. It is critical that states start using empirically validated risk assessments, based not on the offense, but the actual risk.

    Ninety percent or more of FUTURE sex offenses will be committed by people NOT on the registry. (Steven Yoder, “Why Sex Offender Registries Keep Growing Even as Sexual Violence Rates Fall”, 2018, Eli Lehrer, “Rethinking Sex-Offender Registries, 2016,

    Ninety-three percent of victims know their perpetrator, making the stranger danger a myth. (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network-RAINN,

    Thank you, Maggie Lee, for sharing this information on Senate Bill 105.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.