Type to search

Tom Baxter

COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR crash the Democrats’ party

The Democratic Party is expected to name Hillary Clinton as its candidate in the 2016 presidential election. Credit: bccn1wp.wordpress.com

By Tom Baxter

What a movie this campaign will make, if they are still able to make movies by the time it’s over.

COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR are a pair of Russian hacker groups, well known in intelligence circles but not to the general public until the recent hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s computer system. They are widely thought to be the source of the 20,000 emails which Wikileaks released last Friday, just ahead of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.

A dump that large suggests all sorts of information showing the DNC unfairly siding with Hillary Clinton’s campaign over that of Bernie Sanders. In fact the first batch of revelations from the emails seem fairly tame, given that we knew this was going on anyway.

But the timing was perfect. By the time the convention was gaveled to order Monday afternoon, Debbie Wasserman Shultz was out as chair of the party, and any worries the Philadelphia convention would look too buttoned-down compared to the Republican convention in Cleveland last week were out the window.

“Brothers and sisters, this is the real world we live in,” Bernie Sanders implored his followers at a rally near the convention site. But even the third bear in this story couldn’t contain the fury of his followers, which spilled over into an extremely raucous opening.

Needless to say, any story with “email” in the headline isn’t good news for Hillary Clinton. The really ominous news is that Julian Assange, the impresario of Wikipedia, has promised more to come.

Does the transparent involvement of Russian intelligence groups mean Vladimir Putin is taking sides in the U.S. presidential election? The Russian leader has made no secret of his support for nationalist parties in Europe, and he and Donald Trump already have the makings of a bro-mance. And in the long run, will it matter in this election?

The heckling from disgruntled Sanders supporters continued at some level or another throughout the entire evening, even after Sarah Silverman, a prominent Sanders supporter, urged them to “stop being ridiculous.” It could be heard, more faintly by then, during the speech by Sanders closing out the evening.

Imagine what Ted Cruz would have done if he’d had more than a thousand delegates still chanting his name in Cleveland. Sanders did what Cruz couldn’t bring himself to do, capping the evening with a full-throated endorsement of his former adversary. But it remains to be seen whether he can bring his restive delegates along with him.

If there was one speech on this first evening which seemed to bring the convention entirely together it was Michelle Obama’s stemwinder, which seemed tailor-made to play along with the Clinton campaign’s “Role Model” ad currently airing on cable and several battleground states. And so far, there aren’t any charges that she lifted any of her material.

Tom Baxter

Tom Baxter has written about politics and the South for more than four decades. He was national editor and chief political correspondent at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and later edited The Southern Political Report, an online publication, for four years. Tom was the consultant for the 2008 election night coverage sponsored jointly by Current TV, Digg and Twitter, and a 2011 fellow at the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. He has written about the impact of Georgia’s and Alabama's immigration laws in reports for the Center for American Progress. Tom and his wife, Lili, have three adult children and seven grandchildren.


You Might also Like


  1. Chad Carlson July 25, 2016 10:09 pm

    The Russians did it.Report

  2. Burroughston Broch July 25, 2016 11:30 pm

    If the Democrats had not done these despicable acts, they would not have the problems.
    They are getting what they deserve, as the emails prove what was suspected is real.Report

  3. JWK July 26, 2016 9:39 am

    Too much Egotism and Patronage once again from the Party that stands for NOTHING.Report

  4. ironiclad July 26, 2016 9:53 am

    Even if Putin and Trump were in cahoots (comical idea promoted by ABC News and other spinners for Madam C) , here’s the reality: the DNC gave the hackers plenty of material ripe for hacking. No one can blame Donald or Vladimir  for Dems’ boundless, bottomless stupidity.
    As for Madam, they can celebrate the historical first until all of Bill’s women come home. Fact is, Madam has had to ride a man’s coattails to this nomination. Old Bill and Hill – Seedy and Greedy.Report

  5. urban gardener July 26, 2016 2:39 pm

    That the DNC wasn’t in love with Bernie is no surprise. Can’t tell me things are any better with long time establishment republicans and Trump, based on interviews I’ve watched.
    It is completely beyond me, however, that the Party of Ronald Reagan is so “ok” with Trump cozying up with Putin as Putin keeps rumbling towards rebuilding the USSR.
    Reagan must be spinning in his grave by now

  6. ironiclad July 26, 2016 3:17 pm

    urban gardener  UG, did I miss something? Has the FBI already completed its investigation and announced that the hacking was ordered by Putin? Otherwise, why make assumptions? Leave this to Hillary’s media cronies such as ABC, New York Times, New Yorker, NPR and PBS Newshour, etc. to build this narrative for the naive. Clintons and emails have a long, sordid history. That’s my take on it.Report


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.