LOADING

Type to search

Columns Tom Baxter

Democrats coming to Georgia at a crucial time in the nominating process

Tom Baxter

By Tom Baxter

You could almost get the impression, reading Twitter, that so far the Republicans have been more interested in the Democratic presidential debates than the Democrats.

Among Democrats, chatter about the early debates in Miami, Detroit and Houston has faded quickly under the daily gusher of breaking news. The race has tightened considerably, but the debates don’t yet seem to have produced a moment which has captured the Democratic audience.

For Republicans, on the other hand, each large gathering of Democrats has been like a dopey, reassuring sitcom. Every Beto O’Rourke overreach, every jab at Joe Biden has been for this audience a pleasant distraction from the news of impeachment in Congress, crackups in the White House and chaos in Syria.

Tuesday night’s debate in Westerville, Ohio, will be the first to include Tom Steyer, the billionaire who has staked his entire campaign on impeaching Donald Trump. That should at least bring up the subject, which has been largely avoided so far, and change the debate into something less entertaining to Republicans.

By the time the Democrats get together in Georgia next month, at a location yet to be designated but presumed to be in the Metro Atlanta area, the buzz around the debates will have changed considerably. The Georgia debate will be the first to be held within a year of the 2020 election, and there will have been another month of developments in stories which have grown with the ferocity of forest fires over the past couple of weeks.

All this should give a sharpness to the November debate which the early debates have so far lacked. Another thing that might help: fewer moderators. The unwieldiness of a large field of candidates has been compounded in the first debates by squads of up to five moderators. The Georgia debate will be hosted by the Washington Post and MSNBC. One good reporter from each organization would be quite sufficient.

The Democratic National Committee has tightened the requirements to qualify for the November debate, so it should be somewhat less crowded. As of today eight candidates have met the requirement: Biden, Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Tom Steyer, Andrew Yang, and Elizabeth Warren.
Four days before the Georgia debate on Nov. 20, the California Democratic Party and Univision are hosting a presidential forum focusing on Latino issues at the party nominating convention in Long Beach. This isn’t one of the officially sanctioned debates, but as an early-voting state next year, California is hugely important to all the Democrats, and more so to Harris. That weekend event could determine whether she gets to the Georgia debate with enough energy left in her campaign to keep going.

It’s interesting to contemplate what kind of debate we might be looking for if Trump had not determined early on that Biden was the greatest threat to his presidency, and set off the sequence of events which at last moved House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to begin impeachment proceedings. Is there anything he could have done to Warren that could possibly have landed the president in this much hot water?

With Sanders’ health in question and Hunter Biden stepping forward for the first time this week to answer questions about his foreign business dealings, Warren may be the Democratic frontrunner by the time the debate is held here. That’s what a lot of Republicans have wished for, and the Georgia debate could give them an early indication of whether they’ve wished for the right thing.

The early caucuses will be only a couple of months away when the Georgia debate is held, so it will be one of the last opportunities for those Democrats still struggling to reach the inner circle, like Pete Buttigieg or Corey Booker, to score on a big stage.

The DNC committed to 12 candidate debates, six in 2019 and six more in 2020. You have to wonder if it will take that many. After the big March 3 primary, which includes California, Texas and about a dozen other states, there may not be much left to debate. For once, Georgia has a date all to itself next year — March 24. That doesn’t seem very late in the process but next year it will be.

Tags:
Tom Baxter
Tom Baxter

Tom Baxter has written about politics and the South for more than four decades. He was national editor and chief political correspondent at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and later edited The Southern Political Report, an online publication, for four years. Tom was the consultant for the 2008 election night coverage sponsored jointly by Current TV, Digg and Twitter, and a 2011 fellow at the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. He has written about the impact of Georgia’s and Alabama's immigration laws in reports for the Center for American Progress. Tom and his wife, Lili, have three adult children and seven grandchildren.

    1

You Might also Like

2 Comments

  1. Avatar
    brainstar8 October 15, 2019 11:48 am

    The DNC squandered an important opportunity in 2016 to nominate a popular candidate who could win the presidency and rebuild the party from the Obamathon rout. Now, we have Trump’s manic, corrupt presence and are likely to be assaulted again with it in 2020 and beyond.

    A party that has adopted Stacey Abrams as its Poster Radical, whose top three candidates should be spending more time with grandchildren rather than running for the world’s top leadership post, and who have thrown every imaginable concept in a plea for acceptance at future voters … well, what more can be said? Pete Butigieg, Michael Bennett and Tulsi Gabbard don’t have enough one-liners and rhymes to break through. Their clear-headed, rational appeals to the voting population are just not enough. Actually, ATL is the perfect place for the Democrats’ big show.Report

    Reply
  2. Avatar
    Scott October 19, 2019 9:42 pm

    Republicans should be very careful who they wish for. Elizabeth Warren will be a formidable candidate in 2020. Voters have had one overarching message for politicians since Bush II, and that message is that voters want change. They want BIG change not this stuff around the margins. Thats why people voted for Trump. He was the change candidate, not the status quo. What people have learned since then, however, is that change without a plan is worse that the status quo. Warren has a plan, and a strong populist message that would beat Trump in a landslide. She is the change candidate that can win.Report

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.