By Maggie Lee

A former high-ranking staff attorney at Atlanta’s housing authority says she unfairly lost her job in 2017 when she called out new management for risky moves that would delay housing development and jeopardize federal funds.

Karen Fuerst’s court filing has her taking credit for being Atlanta Housing Authority’s legal lead in its 2011 renegotiation of a deal to co-develop housing with Integral, an Atlanta developer, and its partners..

One of the pieces of land to be conveyed is on Memorial Drive near the state Capitol. File/credit: Maggie Lee
This land on Memorial Drive is one of four places Integral affiliates and Atlanta Housing would develop new housing. Each spot is is adjacent to developments Integral has already built: Auburn Pointe, CollegeTown, Villages at Carver and Capitol Gateway. File/credit: Maggie Lee

Speaking up for that deal, she alleges, is part of what got her into trouble during the tenure of AHA CEO Catherine Buell in a time of heavy leadership turnover.

Buell “appeared to have a personal agenda contrary to AHA’s mission and deliberately avoided seeking counsel from Fuerst,” the lawsuit claims. The complaint was unsealed by a federal court Tuesday.

Atlanta Housing, in its reply in court, called Fuerst’s filing a “classic tale of a subordinate employee’s desire to dictate the terms of her employment” to the CEO.

To its supporters, like then-AHA leader Renee Glover, the 2011 Integral deal was enterprising. Integral and the authority would develop deeply affordable housing at four places in the city. Integral affiliates would also get the option to buy adjacent property years later, but at old prices. Then with the authority, Integral affiliates would develop market-rate property on the new sites.

Fast forward to 2017, when Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed and Buell at the housing authority attacked the deal in two separate court cases.

The city of Atlanta filed, then dropped, a lawsuit against Integral, its founder and CEO Egbert Perry and former Atlanta Housing Authority leader Renee Glover. The authority itself sued the four Integral-related companies that would build the second round of housing.

Buell, in 2017, said the housing authority was not a land bank for developers to purchase land at “rock-bottom” prices.

However, court rulings have broadly vindicated the legality of the deal signed by Integral and the AH leadership of a decade ago. And Buell departed when Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms took office in early 2018.

Fuerst’s court filing alleges that by 2017, she was being “walled out” of work involving Integral, and that private attorneys hired by Buell were investigating the Integral agreement, including Fuerst’s role in it.

And she’s telling a federal court that damage to her reputation has made her unable to get new work.

Her court filing says she was the victim of “retaliatory discharge” in March 2017 from a job that paid nearly $220,000 plus benefits. She’s seeking unspecified damages.

Fuerst’s lawyer, Halsey Knapp, said Tuesday that it is “confounding” that the organization hasn’t figured out a way “to build more housing and have less controversy.”

Atlanta Housing’s court filing says Fuerst is no whistleblower and that the former staff attorney is relying on an obscure bit of law to make an amorphous accusation without bringing any evidence of corruption on Buell’s part.  The authority accuses Fuerst of trying to listen in on conference calls uninvited and of talking about her disagreements with Buell to many people.

“Atlanta Housing strenuously denies Ms. Fuerst’s claims and will vigorously defend itself against these false allegations,” the housing authority said in an emailed statement after this story was first published. “As you will see in an attachment to the case file, Ms. Fuerst attempted to file a HUD OIG complaint against Atlanta Housing and HUD dismissed that complaint as having no merit.”

(There are HUD documents in the case file. An email from the federal housing authority to Fuerst said that she did not qualify as a whistleblower.)


Certain documents in this case are available free from CourtListener, including all documents cited in this story. Some documents are redacted in part.

Maggie Lee is a freelance reporter who's been covering Georgia and metro Atlanta government and politics since 2008.

Join the Conversation


    1. I had to decide whether or not it was worthwhile to respond here. I have decided to do so as I don’t want my hard-earned name mentioned in this context.

      The initial allegation is a complete lie. The following statements are fine. I am and always will be on the side of any community in which I work and agree I should be truthful, accountable, responsive and respectful to all involved. And I expect reciprocity.

      Finally, the email address you have provided is known to you and many others precisely because I am, as you stated “for the community” and freely gave my contact information over the years. I have and will always welcome a discussion with all who would like to engage as it’s up to all of us to build the communities we deserve.

  1. Friends of Kasim Reed should still run for cover. Fuerst is a top notch attorney. They destroy you if you don’t do like you are told.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.