Type to search

Columns Tom Baxter

If past is precedent, GOP runoff could be a squeaker

By Tom Baxter

Pop quiz: Who got the most votes in the Republican primary the last time there was an open-seat race for governor eight years ago?

Your first thought might be Nathan Deal, who went on to win the primary runoff that year and went on to win two terms as governor. Sharper memories will recall that the congresswoman currently representing the 6th District, Karen Handel, was the leader in the first primary election. There may be some lessons from that race that could be helpful in figuring this year’s contest for governor.

Deal trailed Handel in the 2010 general primary by a margin of 39-26 percent. Secretary of State Brian Kemp trailed Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle in last week’s Republican primary by a 34-22 percent margin. The fact that a second-lace finisher with similar numbers was able to overtake the frontrunner in 2010 should be enough to give Cagle cause for concern, as we head into another of those sizzling summer runoffs. On the surface, he has more advantages than Handel had when she was attempting to hold off Deal, but that still has to be proven.

The only significant race Cagle has faced within his party up to now was in 2006, when he defeated Ralph Reed to win the GOP nomination for lieutenant governor. Running unopposed, he got 535,243 votes in the primary in 2010, and 495,243 votes in 2014.

There’s not much to say about unopposed races, but that trajectory does seem to indicate some cooling among Republican primary voters as Cagle has become more identified with the political establishment. The Kemp-Cagle matchup has the looks of another very close finish like the one in 2008. An interesting side competition is the one between the National Rifle Association, which has endorsed Cagle, and GeorgiaCarry.org, which has endorsed Kemp.

Deal’s runoff victory over Handel — he won by less than 3,000 votes out of more than 568,000 votes cast — would prove to be the closest call in his political career, much more so than his general election race later in 2010 against former Gov. Roy Barnes. It also serves as a watershed in the process we talked about last week, by which the parties’ candidates have become increasingly separated by gender.

It’s an historic first that an African-American woman, Stacey Abrams, will lead the Democratic ticket as the party’s candidate for governor, with another woman, Sarah Riggs Amico, as her running mate for lieutenant governor. But the Democrats had women lieutenant governor candidates in 2010 and 2014, and African-American candidates of both sexes have been on the Democratic ballot throughout the last several elections.

You could have predicted this year’s Democratic ticket based on the way things were trending at the beginning of the century, but not necessarily the Republican ticket, whatever all-male combination it turns out to be. Handel’s 2010 candidacy wasn’t a novelty, after all. In the 2002 Republican primary, Linda Schrenko polled second behind Sonny Perdue. Nancy Schaefer finished 3rd in the 1998 GOP primary. So the absence of Republican women contenders in this open cycle represents a change, not a reversion to any contemporary norm.

Obviously, the surge in energy around women Democratic candidates across the country has something to do with the chemistry here in Georgia, but since so many of the important races have been Democratic women running against each other and Republican men running against each other, it’s hard to say what the national mood foretells for the race in the fall.

Since the number of primary votes does measure intensity to some extent, however, it’s worth pointing out that Abrams got 423,250 almost twice as much as Cagle or Kemp, and more than two-thirds of the total number of votes cast in the Republican primary.

This doesn’t tell us how far she can extend her appeal or how well she can do in November. But she begins with a lot of energy and a nine-week head start over her eventual Republican rival.

Lieutenant governor’s races don’t usually generate much news, but this year’s could be interesting. Amico is a newcomer with a business background, which makes her an interesting running mate with Abrams. Former state Senate majority leader David Shafer came close to winning the Republican primary with a clear majority, but he fell short a faces a runoff with state Rep. Geoff Duncan.

The Senate Ethics Committee dismissed charges of sexual harassment against Shafer, lodged as he was beginning his campaign by a woman lobbyist, and he doesn’t seem to have been affected much in the primary. The larger question is how a candidate with a ton of endorsements from the Republican old guard and a lot of experience under the Gold Dome fares against the second-generation CEO of a trucking company with an MBA from Harvard.

Tom Baxter

Tom Baxter has written about politics and the South for more than four decades. He was national editor and chief political correspondent at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and later edited The Southern Political Report, an online publication, for four years. Tom was the consultant for the 2008 election night coverage sponsored jointly by Current TV, Digg and Twitter, and a 2011 fellow at the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. He has written about the impact of Georgia’s and Alabama's immigration laws in reports for the Center for American Progress. Tom and his wife, Lili, have three adult children and seven grandchildren.


You Might also Like

1 Comment

  1. GeorgeWilson July 24, 2018 1:14 pm

    Republican policies cannot cope with the new world realities
    We are living in a world shaped by vast accelerations in technology, globalization, climate change and population growth. The government’s job is to enable more citizens to thrive in such a world and cushion its worst impacts. These are lessons that the Republicans are struggling with, because of the hold that the oligarchs and special interests, led by the president, have on their party. They are going down a disastrous path.
    The new age that we are now in requires trust, teamwork, risk taking, and social investments. These are values that the GOP and their brand are incompatible within their policies and ideology. The GOP and Trump miss a key ingredient in making America competitive again: they ignore the growing problem of income inequality.
    America isn’t full of people stupid or unimaginative or afraid to reinvent themselves. Rather, it is full of people who lack the money to do any of the things that they need to change their life. Lack of money makes it hard to learn a new trade or return to school, or even to move somewhere searching for superior opportunities.
    Another example is the lack of medical health coverage, making it difficult to be a new start up or entrepreneur. Conditions are created for desperation and willingness for people to grasp at the straws of authoritarianism and demagoguery.
    Finally, as a gross example of inequity, 100 CEOs have amassed more retirement savings than 41 percent of all Americans combined. In sum, we need to move forward as a nation, and that’s going to involve some redistribution of the wealth now concentrated in the hands of too few people. We are talking about the top one percent. A collective effort is required to assist and aid the communities devastated by globalization and automation.Report


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.