Type to search

David Pendered

Stadium communities file wish-lists as limits of city’s $15 million promise hit home for community benefits deal

A significant number of people concerned about the community benefits deal have attended meetings, including this one on Sept. 4. Credit: David Pendered

By David Pendered

Time is getting short if a community benefits deal for the future Falcons stadium is to be approved this year.

The calendar is filling with campaign events for the Atlanta City Council elections on Nov. 5. The final council meeting of the year is scheduled for Dec. 2. The clock matters because Atlanta cannot provide any of its $200 million in stadium construction funds until after the council approves a benefits deal, and the Falcons are said to want to begin construction in the first three months of 2014.

A significant number of people concerned about the community benefits deal have attended meetings, including this one on Sept. 4. Credit: David Pendered

A significant number of people concerned about the community benefits deal have attended meetings, including this one on Sept. 4. Credit: David Pendered

Meantime, limitations are becoming evident in the stadium’s ability to spark the urban renewal that’s to be guided by a benefits deal. The city’s $15 million won’t begin to address the wish list. Community morale hasn’t been helped by the discovery of the source of that $15 million.

Mayor Kasim Reed announced in March that it was part of the city’s contribution to the stadium deal. Then residents read in a strategic plan made public this month that the $15 million was authorized in 2012 by Invest Atlanta, the city’s development authority. The mayor chairs Invest Atlanta.

The negotiations between the city and neighborhoods, which began July 2, have yet to produce a single point that could be entered into a proposed community benefits deal. The time to act has arrived, according to Councilperson Michael Julian Bond, who resides in the area and chairs the Community Benefits Plan Committee that is drafting the deal.

“This isn’t our first time at the rodeo, in terms of figuring out what to do with English Avenue and Vine City,” Bond said. “At a certain point, it becomes what Dr. King said: A time to speak and a time to act. We are at a point where it is time to act, time to get settled down and get something adopted.

“More than $250 million has been spent in this community since 2001, and it looks worse than it did in 2001,” Bond said. “At some time, you’ve got to fish or cut bait. I believe we are at that point.”

Atlanta City Councilperson Michael Julian Bond

Atlanta City Councilperson Michael Julian Bond

Bond has sought to run a tight process since he took over as chair in September. He reminds speakers to stick to their time limit. He reminds the crowd not to talk over speakers. He isn’t reluctant to rule committee members out of order.

At the meeting last week, Bond ruled committee member Howard Beckham’s motion out of order. The motion called for the committee to remain intact until after the community has signed a community benefits deal. Bond ruled that the committee cannot extend its life; only the city council can do that. The Rev. Beckham represents the English Avenue/Vine City Ministerial Alliance.

When Councilmember Ivory Lee Young, Jr.  offered a friendly amendment to Beckham’s motion, Bond ruled Young’s amendment out of order. The fact that the motion was out of order made the amendment out of order, Bond determined.

Young also hit a wall when he sought to add members to the committee – representatives of the Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Department of Transportation. The GWCC will own the land beneath the future stadium. GDOT controls Northside Drive in front of the future stadium, as well as the highways leading toward it. Young contended that the state will reap most of the benefits of the new stadium while Atlanta will be left to provide for the fans.

Again, the determination was that only the city council can alter the committee. In addition, the determination was that state agencies cannot be compelled to serve on a city committee.

Ultimately, Young’s motion was approved in the form of an invitation to the state agencies to attend and present at a committee meeting.

Another motion that was shot down called for the city to allocate a portion of the hotel/motel tax to pay for community benefits. This proposal was submitted by Jerry Lapido, a businessman who represents English Avenue. Both Bond and Reed’s deputy COO, Katrina Taylor-Parks, said that motion was outside the committee’s purview.

The process of assembling a community benefits deal began in public began July 2, at the first meeting of the Community Benefits Plan Committee. Since that time, nothing has been finalized and no instructions provided to committee staffers, whose job it is to work out the technical details of the committee’s vision for a community benefits deal.

That said, negotiations do appear to be entering their final stage.

Some committee members said at the Sept. 18 meeting they expect the key elements of a potential deal are being assembled by the staff of Invest Atlanta, city departments, and Mayor Kasim Reed’s office.

Invest Atlanta did not respond to a request for information, submitted Sept. 20, concerning the development authority’s next steps in preparing a community benefits deal. Invest Atlanta is coordinating the city’s negotiation with neighborhood leaders.

The community benefits committee is slated to meet Oct. 3. The agenda has not been made public.

Only after a deal is approved can Atlanta can borrow up to $200 million to provide for the stadium’s construction.

As commentators on this site have noted, the total cost to be paid by the city’s hotel/motel tax will be much higher than the $200 million in bonds that are authorized to be sold. Interest charges and fees associated with the bonds will raise the total costs until the bonds are paid off, at a date the council voted to be as far in the future as Dec. 31, 2050.


David Pendered

David Pendered, Managing Editor, is an Atlanta journalist with more than 30 years experience reporting on the region’s urban affairs, from Atlanta City Hall to the state Capitol. Since 2008, he has written for print and digital publications, and advised on media and governmental affairs. Previously, he spent more than 26 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and won awards for his coverage of schools and urban development. David graduated from North Carolina State University and was a Western Knight Center Fellow.


You Might also Like


  1. filtered78 September 24, 2013 11:07 am

    The community needs jobs, effective policing/security measures and thoughtful community building programs.
    Use some of the money to fund SBA-type loans so community-members can open small businesses that cater to the neighborhood, as well as stadium-going fans.  Think restaurants, bars, convenience stores, etc.  Empower the community to take a stake in their own future.
    Fund effective neighborhood watch/policing programs similar to Midtown Blue.  This may involve gang-related details or at-risk youth programs.
    Fund groups and seminars that educate children on pregnancy, healthy relationships and marriage; fund daycare centers for working-class parents and early childhood education.
    Fund educational opportunities for community youth that work in the hospitality outlets within the stadium and tie it in with Georgia State hospitality program.Report

  2. bothered September 24, 2013 2:23 pm

    None of the recommendations made or suggested by two of the most neglected communities in our City and seen as valid concerns.  The majority membership of the CBA Committee are overpowered by the staff of the City, City related entities (NPUs), City Council members, Invest Atlanta and appointees who have vested interests in the outcome.  How can the voice of the communities be heard or considered under this structure?  I suggest their voices cannot and will not be heard resulting in a CBA document that will not rebuild their neighborhoods and especially the two that are seen as disposable because their populations are poor and disenfranchised.  Sad to say, the mood of the country about the poor exists right here in this City – Atlanta.Report

  3. Steel Magnolia September 24, 2013 2:59 pm

    Unfortunately, there are those who believe that adding more churches to the Vine City and English Avenue neighborhoods are to be considered as elements of neighborhood revitalization and drivers of economic development. My recommendation to those with this thought process is to take real estate and community development 101.
    Additionally, its interesting that churches who have been in close proximity to Vine City and English Avenue for over 100 years have recently discovered that those neighborhoods are in need of assistance with human capital development and revitalization. It makes you go um,um,what is this all about all of a sudden?Report

  4. Steel Magnolia September 25, 2013 11:06 am

    Perhaps we should review the “waterfall provision” in the agreement between the Stadium Corporation, the City of Atlanta and the Georgia World Congress Center. I think we will find that after all the bond requirements, operational  and maintenance costs, interest fees, etc., 100% of the excess goes to the Stadium Corporation (Atlanta Falcons). Therein lies the potential for significant amounts of funds that could possibly be used for community benefits.Report


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.