LOADING

Type to search

Latest Reports

Gwinnett County transit vote: Local control is the watchword

David Pendered

By David Pendered

In Gwinnett County, local control is the watchword in the campaign for a proposed 1 percent sales tax to expand transit. MARTA will be involved only because state law requires it – and the role is restricted to heavy rail.

Duluth, transit

Gwinnett County would oversee an expanded bus system that would serve the Satellite Place office complex, located along Satellite Boulevard east of Duluth, if Gwinnett voters approve a 1 percent sales tax referendum on the Nov. 3 ballot. Credit: David Pendered

MARTA is equally explicit in stating that Gwinnett County will exercise control over MARTA’s functions in Gwinnett through intergovernmental agreements. These agreements will help address the fact that Gwinnett County does not have a representative on MARTA’s board – because Gwinnett voters have rejected proposals to join MARTA.

The result is a transit proposal that seeks to assure voters that that Gwinnett’s transit tax dollars will not disappear into MARTA coffers, rather than funding bus and paratransit service that’s overseen by Gwinnett officials. The referendum is on the Nov. 3 ballot.

MARTA is required by state law to administer the region’s heavy rail network. This caveat is the reason MARTA’s involvement is required in Gwinnett’s plan to extend heavy rail from MARTA’s Doraville Station to a planned transit hub at Jimmy Carter Boulevard. The plan is part of a proposed countywide transit enhancement.

This state law created a transit authority, the ATL, to unify the governance of transit systems in metro Atlanta in an effort to alleviate traffic congestion and air pollution.

Lawmakers recognized MARTA as the regional provider of heavy rail train service and wrote the following provision into House Bill 930, which then Gov. Nathan Deal signed into law in 2018:

  • “[The] Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority shall serve as the sole operator of any system of transportation which utilizes heavy rail within the jurisdiction of the authority.”
Gwinnett, Norcross

Gwinnett County voters are to decide the fate of a 1 percent transit tax that would provide for a transit hub that could spur the redevelopment of blighted industrial areas along Crescent Drive, near Norcross. Credit: David Pendered
c

Gwinnett County’s official educational materials regarding the transit proposal – Your plan, Your vote, Your choice – has an entire section that’s titled, Local Control.

The first sentence states:

  • “The transit funding vote in November puts Gwinnett County in control of its transit planning, funding, projects and services.”

The third paragraph of the county’s educational campaign details MARTA’s involvement and states, in full:

  • “In this new Gwinnett Transit Plan, only the rail line connecting Gwinnett’s new Multimodal Hub at Jimmy Carter Boulevard to MARTA’s Doraville Station will be operated by MARTA, as stipulated by state law. Gwinnett County will have local control of all other transit planning, funding, projects and services, and system operations.”

MARTA, in an email exchange last week, emphasized that intergovernmental agreements will stipulate MARTA’s role in Gwinnett County’s proposed heavy rail service:

  • “MARTA and Gwinnett are in discussions around an Intergovernmental Agreement that will govern the construction and operation of the heavy rail.”

Asked how Gwinnet will have a voice in the operations of the heavy rail line to be built in Gwinnett, MARTA responded:

  • “There will be an intergovernmental agreement between Gwinnett County and MARTA that governs the operation of the heavy rail.”

Asked about the potential start date for rail service, if voters approve the referendum, MARTA observed:

  • “That is not yet known.”

Asked about the milestones leading to the start of service in Gwinnett, MARTA responded:

  • “The project delivery method has not yet been determined, so milestones are not yet known. Generally, the extension will need to be designed and engineered, constructed, tested and accepted.”

 

Tags:
David Pendered
David Pendered

David Pendered, Managing Editor, is an Atlanta journalist with more than 30 years experience reporting on the region’s urban affairs, from Atlanta City Hall to the state Capitol. Since 2008, he has written for print and digital publications, and advised on media and governmental affairs. Previously, he spent more than 26 years with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and won awards for his coverage of schools and urban development. David graduated from North Carolina State University and was a Western Knight Center Fellow.

    1

You Might also Like

3 Comments

  1. Avatar
    Dave Lender September 28, 2020 3:18 am

    Screw Marta Vote NoReport

    Reply
  2. Avatar
    Jeane September 29, 2020 8:31 am

    I will vote “YES”! We seriously need a coordinated effort in mass transit in Gwinnett County. But NOT by sacrificing control to MARTA. This seems to be a well thought out effort to give a win-win to both MARTA & Gwinnett.Report

    Reply
  3. Avatar
    lynn September 29, 2020 9:42 am

    Higher taxes for us………….i would rather our tax money help give each person who needs transportation a new car or taxi ride then see our tax dollars wasted by government.Report

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.